Re: xlib6g and xfree86-common

1999-05-28 Thread Steve Greenland
On 28-May-99, 14:21 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thu, 27 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > > FACT 2: xlib6g depends on xfree86-common > I was talking about your implicit statement: > > "xlib6g must have a Depends: field on xfree86-common". > > from which FACT 2 derives. >

xlib6g and xfree86-common

1999-05-28 Thread Santiago Vila
[ I'm using a new thread so that we do not use the proposal thread any longer ]. Thu, 27 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > FACT 1: xlib6g is of standard priority > FACT 2: xlib6g depends on xfree86-common > POLICY: packages do not depend on other packages with lower priority > THEREFORE: xfre

Bug#38212: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] rewrite of section 5.7

1999-05-28 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, 27 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Please note (again) that I have not formally objected to your proposal > > (i.e. by saying "I object to this proposal"). > > All right. Ok. As far as I'm concerned, you have three