Re: Bug#37532: coda-doc: HTML files gzipped

1999-05-13 Thread Anders Hammarquist
reopen 37532 thanks > > > HTML documentation in /usr/doc/coda-doc/html is gzipped. > > > I think it should not. > > > > Policy says it should (and many (most?) browsers will read gzipped > > html as is). > > Policy says that text files should be compressed (6.3). It doesn't say > that HTML shoul

Re: [PROPOSAL] Patented software == non-free?

1999-05-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 12, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Which country is that? If it is in Europe, I am afraid >the situation may be about to change. I know that. >I'd like to know RMS' opinion on the issue: why should I suffer from >silly laws of other countries? >What, precisely,

Re: xfonts-package-name

1999-05-13 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BR> On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 08:33:39PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki BR> wrote: >> I maintain package xfonts-latin2-biznet. I think about change of >> package name. Maybe xfonts-biznet-iso8859-2 will be better? >> >> My

Re: New non-us and main, and RSA

1999-05-13 Thread James Troup
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems from what I have heard that we consider IDEA and RSA to be > non-free due to the patents on them in various countries and this is > why we have the gpg-rsa and gpg-idea modules in non-free. However we > also have libssl, openssl, cipe and ssle