Re: logrotation

Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Could one of the proposers or seconds please create the > language that should go into policy? A paragraph on what is expected > of package developers (drop a file into logrotate), and possibly > *examples* (which would not be formally policy, and may get out of

Re: contrib

Hi, >>"Remco" == Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Remco> I'd think packages that are too buggy shouldn't be released at all, not Remco> even into contrib (_especially_ not into contrib[1]). Perhaps Debian Remco> Policy is wrong? Or am I missing some point here? I think you a

Adminstrative changes, and the FHS

Hi folks, I just uploaded policy and packaging manual packages to master, and ave incorporated all the amendments and typos fixes for the packages. As a purely adminstrative issue, I would like to put packaging-manual.sgml also into the debian-policy package. I do not mean to

Re: logrotation

Hi, Could one of the proposers or seconds please create the language that should go into policy? A paragraph on what is expected of package developers (drop a file into logrotate), and possibly *examples* (which would not be formally policy, and may get out of date wrt to the software