Re: egcc maintainer

1998-12-17 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 10:01:54AM +, Oliver Elphick wrote: > Enrique Zanardi wrote: > >> Nope, the dreaded `exactly one maintainer' clause in 2.3.2 is still > >> very much in place as of the latest policy. > > > >You're right. We should fix the policy. Anyone with good skills in > >e

Re: egcc maintainer

1998-12-17 Thread Oliver Elphick
Enrique Zanardi wrote: >> Nope, the dreaded `exactly one maintainer' clause in 2.3.2 is still >> very much in place as of the latest policy. > >You're right. We should fix the policy. Anyone with good skills in >english writing that wants to modify that clause? How about the following:

Re: egcc maintainer

1998-12-17 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 08:29:18PM +, James Troup wrote: > Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > AFAIK, ther's nothing in the policy against maintainer groups. > > Nope, the dreaded `exactly one maintainer' clause in 2.3.2 is still > very much in place as of the latest policy. Yo