RE: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.

Hi, On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Darren Benham wrote: > OOps... took out the wrong addresses in the CC field... > > When maintainer's change, who's going to change the subscription list? In case The Maintainer of a package changes identity, the "maintainers maintainer" would. With a single change, a

Re: Constitution not packaged!

Previously Darren Benham wrote: > Why not the debian-doc package with the social contract, manifesto, et al? Sounds reasonable. Apparently I missed that one since the name doesn't start with debian-. It's cunningly hidden as doc-debian. I'll file a bugreport on doc-debian to ask for the inclusion

RE: Constitution not packaged!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Why not the debian-doc package with the social contract, manifesto, et al? On 14-Dec-98 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Hi! > > I was planning to reread the constitution yesterday and discovered > it is not packaged. We clearly need to fix that. I suggested to > Adam

Constitution not packaged!

Hi! I was planning to reread the constitution yesterday and discovered it is not packaged. We clearly need to fix that. I suggested to Adam Harris that he include it in developers-reference, and he said he would rather see it in debian-policy. Personally I think either is fine, although I slightly