Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> This sounds very useful! Are we going to package it somehow?
Ben> The problem is that one of the license requirements (3c (?))
Ben> puts it into non-free.
Again, the
Marcus.Brinkmann writes:
> Getting as much free software on CD as possible is something that I
> consider of high value (it really saves money for us who are living in
> such a country).
There is no reason why the CD vendor can't add back packages that are
missing from the Debian site he mirrors s
>are the examples for diversions are wrong, or do I miss something?
>dpkg-divert has to be called for an upgrade as well and for the purge
>of a package as well.
dpkg-divert has to be called once to install a diversion, and once to
remove it. If it is called twice, this does no harm; the last set
On Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 05:28:43PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 11:20:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Although it is out of context, let me quote something from the social
> > contract I feel appropriate here:
> >
> > We Won't Hide Problems
>
> How do you equate r
>
>
> There have been some discussion about a new setup for the archive to
> better represent import & export problems. I want to make a few remarks
> which I think people should consider:
>
> * I think we should always have a `main archive' that can be mirrored
> everywhere without having to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) writes:
> As you see, the file is sourced, which means that the values of the
> variables defined should be properly quoted.
Yes, it is a bug in login that it doesn't do this.
ssh does the same...
It makes sense, because this way the file is in
Maintainer: Debian Policy
Severity: normal
Status: pending
This mail is being sent to you because the indicated bug reports have been
marked as overdue (i.e. has been open longer than 9 months). Overdue
reminders are repeated monthly.
#14701 packaging-manual [Amendment 98.11.01] bashis
7 matches
Mail list logo
