Re: Configuration management / proposal

1998-11-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 02:13:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman écrivait: > Sorry to say this, but this is complete and utter nonsense. The only > difference was if you used a virtual database that can consist of > multiple sources or a single database. How you access that database > is the same for bot

Re: Configuration management / proposal

1998-11-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Read Ian's argument. This design make it difficult to say : "Now I > want to remove all mail-transport-agent/* keys". Sorry to say this, but this is complete and utter nonsense. The only difference was if you used a virtual database that can consist of multiple

Re: Configuration management / proposal

1998-11-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 02:18:56AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman écrivait: > Why? This is a lot less flexible imho. And it does not reduce the > complexity (read my design again). Read Ian's argument. This design make it difficult to say : "Now I want to remove all mail-transport-agent/* keys". And the

Re: Configuration management / proposal

1998-11-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I agree with Ian that each machine should have only one database, > possibly none too (think about a remote db). Why? This is a lot less flexible imho. And it does not reduce the complexity (read my design again). > The DB access should be done through a progra