Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've always found exim's configuration to be formidable. It is
> configurable but not easially configurable. You do have the read the (very
> long) documents detailing the mechanics for what is going on and have to
> understand them before you can attem
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After that it is not terribly bad.. But definately not something I would
>wish on someone who does not understand mail.
Uhm - someone who doesn't understand mail shouldn't fiddle around with
_any_ MTA. Far to dangerous. S
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 05:36:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > It's by far the simplest MTA configuration I have ever worked with (and
> > that is old sendmail (sendmail.cf, no M4), smail, and exim.
>
> I've always found exim's configuration to be formidable. It is
> configurable but not e
On Tue, 27 October 1998 17:36:44 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I've always found exim's configuration to be formidable. It is
> configurable but not easially configurable. You do have the read the (very
> long) documents detailing the mechanics for what is going on and have to
> understand them b
On 27 Oct 1998, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> > > My favorite is exim, because it is very configurable. Vmailer is
> > > quite limited once you try to go beyond a simple configuration.
> >
> > If anything that is the worst part of exim :| It's configuration format
> > still seems complicated to me.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) wrote on 27.08.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 27 Aug 1998, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 26, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >It seems like everybody agrees on switching to exim, but nothing as
> > > >been
> > > I don't think so.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
