Bug#27906: PROPOSED] Binary-only NMU's

1998-10-18 Thread Daniel Martin
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, I missed most of this. I get a lot of binary only NMU's > from Paul and Roman with an accompanying diff that also goes in the BTS. > I just want to register my vote for allowing this. > It is an unstable distribution-- this is meant to

Re: Bug#27906: PROPOSED] Binary-only NMU's

1998-10-18 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 08:55:22PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote: > Sorry, I missed most of this. I get a lot of binary only NMU's > from Paul and Roman with an accompanying diff that also goes in the BTS. > I just want to register my vote for allowing this. > It is an unstable distributio

pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy List

1998-10-18 Thread Nag
Maintainer: Debian Policy List Severity: normal Status: pending This mail is being sent to you because the indicated bug reports have been marked as overdue (i.e. has been open longer than 9 months). Overdue reminders are repeated monthly. #7890 debian-policy [AMENDMENT] Policy man

pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy

1998-10-18 Thread Nag
Maintainer: Debian Policy Severity: normal Status: pending This mail is being sent to you because the indicated bug reports have been marked as overdue (i.e. has been open longer than 9 months). Overdue reminders are repeated monthly. #6206 packaging-manual dpkg documentation needs sl

Re: Bug#27906: PROPOSED] Binary-only NMU's

1998-10-18 Thread John Lapeyre
Sorry, I missed most of this. I get a lot of binary only NMU's from Paul and Roman with an accompanying diff that also goes in the BTS. I just want to register my vote for allowing this. It is an unstable distribution-- this is meant to be a temporary situation; putting the patch