On 10-Oct-98 Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Just yesterday I emailed trying to fix the contacts web
> page, specifically updating the maintainership of the Policy,
> Packaging Manual, and Developer's Reference. So hopefully they will
> update those pages w/o further intervention being required by us...
I formally second the proposals in the BTS as 26461, 25385, and 21185.
I urge the originally submitter to get all the seconds in a row and
move towards a vote as quickly as our Policy Policy allows. If we
can't get these "no-brainer" type proposals to move through the system
at all then we have t
Santiago Vila Doncel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 21 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > - ship HTML versions in the binary package, in the directory
> > - /usr/doc/package or its subdirectories.
> > + ship HTML versions in a binary package, under the directory
> > + /usr/doc/ o
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (See also my post to debian-devel about this. In particular, I'm
> > opposed to /var/state and think we should ignore the FHS on this
> > point.)
> >
> > One of the key changes that the FHS has compared to the
[BTW, should I CC both the BTS *and* debian-policy?]
Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As specified in policy, packages with shared libs generally run "ldconfig"
> from "postinst configure".
Actually, you're wrong, that's from the Packaging Manual, not the
Policy Manual.
> Thu
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And what documents did Policy FINIALLY settle on assuming???
Packaging Manual and the Policy Manual. I think they all ceeded me
the Developer's Reference. I hope my recent work on that has
vindicated the idea that I can turn that document around more q
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking over the contacts web page and I notice that there is still a
> policy manager listed (and attributed to Ian). I was wondering if there is a
> better name to fillin (Manoj?) or if that position should be removed.
Just yesterday I emailed tr
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just put non-free and contrib as part of the section. bash is in the
> base section. xv is in the non-free/graphics section.
Hmm. From a taxonomic standpoint, I don't like this, because now when
I'm talking about sections, I could either mean "non-free" or
8 matches
Mail list logo
