conffiles vs. scripts (was: /etc/shells policy?)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj Srivastava) wrote on 18.09.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > __ > If two or more packages use the same configuration file, one of these > packages has to be defined as *owner* of the configuration fi

Re: /usr/X11R6

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Engel) wrote on 30.08.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Aug 30, 1998 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > agreed. why don't ask the fhs team why they left the link for this single > > package ? > > They probably knew it was a contentious, potentially div

Re: Call for Seconds, Take II

Hi >>"Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> Also, "ChangeLog" files are named with capital `C' and `L' when you Karl> use `C-x 4 a' with `add-log' in the emacsen. I think we should Karl> permit that spelling, which is very standard and more common than all Karl> lower

Re: Call for seconds: Policy modifications

Hi >>"Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Manoj> No you don't. Not when I am installing/updating Debian on Manoj> my 200 machine compute farm. Especially since we do not Manoj> have unattended installs anyway, and ev