On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 05:10:37AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Zed Pobre wrote:
> > Part 3: (bug#25385)
> >
> > Section 4.1 ("Architecture specification strings") should be changed
> > to allow the Hurd operating system. This requires that the segment
> > reading:
> >
> > where `' is one
On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 12:08:54PM +0200, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> In August I posted two messages to linux.debian.policy, but no one
> answered. Is it because no one was interested in it, or because there is
> not a bidirectional gateway between the list and the group? In the latt
On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Zed Pobre wrote:
> > Part 3: (bug#25385)
> >
> > Section 4.1 ("Architecture specification strings") should be changed
> > to allow the Hurd operating system. This requires that the segment
> > reading:
> >
> > where `' is one of the following: i3
In August I posted two messages to linux.debian.policy, but no one
answered. Is it because no one was interested in it, or because there is
not a bidirectional gateway between the list and the group? In the latter
case, I'll resend the messages to the list instead. Please someone le
Your message dated 13 Sep 1998 01:27:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line A normal version of policy has been released
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated 13 Sep 1998 01:27:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line A normal version of policy has been released
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> I think that any information worty of displaying in a package's postinst
Raul> (aside from prompts) should also appear in the package's description.
I think not.
__
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> to:
>
> If a package has a vitally important piece of information to pass to
> the user (such as "don't run me as I am, you must edit the following
> configuration files first or you risk your system emitting
> badly-formatted messages"), it shoul
Zed Pobre wrote:
> Part 2: (bug#25911)
>
> Section 5.5 ("Log files") should be moved to be a subsection of
> section 3.3 ("Files"), becoming section 3.3.8, placing it after
> "Configuration files". Section 3.3.8 ("Permissions and owners")
> should become Section 3.3.9. All subsections of Section
Hi,
>>"Zed" == Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zed> If the upstream changelog file is HTML formatted, it must be
Zed> accessable as /usr/doc//changelog.html.gz.
Why not changelog.html? That way they can be looked at using
any HTML browser. What is the reationale for asking H
10 matches
Mail list logo
