Re: Nameing of selfmade CD Images

Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What would a CD Image be called that contains all of main, some of > contrib and non-us and some additional Packages and some non-Debian > stuff (just 1 MB or so) for m68k. The CD would contain the complete > Official Image and then some more. You can't cal

Policy document amendment process

Hi, The packages debian-policy and packaging manual have been imported into CVS on cvs.debian.org; and new versions have been uploaded that set the maintainer address to the policy mailing list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to finish some adminstrative work invilved in getting t

Re: Nameing of selfmade CD Images

Debian gnu/linux 2.0 m68k binary cdrom you might want to add something like "build useing the official scripts with own enhancements" or so. but the name is "Debian gnu/linux 2.0 m68k binary cdrom", without the word "official". of course you can add "brendlow's" or, use a different name, as longs

Filesystemstandard and multiple architectures?

Is anybody working on the filesystemstandard in regard to multiple architectures on ONE server and installation of multiple workstations with common diskspace? How can Packages be installed on a server and on a client (which doesn't have write permissions to the servers share section)? Is anyone w

Nameing of selfmade CD Images

What would a CD Image be called that contains all of main, some of contrib and non-us and some additional Packages and some non-Debian stuff (just 1 MB or so) for m68k. The CD would contain the complete Official Image and then some more. Could that be labeled "Contains the Official Debian binary-m

Re: A mechanism to amend policy documents

Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Do you not find the version numbers suggestive? > > > > debian-policy_2.4.1.3.deb > > developers-reference_2.4.1.3.deb > > packaging-manual_2.4.1.1.deb Suggestive but not compelling. > >