On Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 06:01:31PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > Package: procmail
> > Version: 3.10.7-6
> >
> > It seems that procmail is creating mailboxes with mode 660 (the MTA is
> > sendmail) and this is quite insecure as security holes in MUA
Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think your ad hominems are unjustified and unnecessary, Martin.
Martin> Hehe, maybe give credit to manoj for this line. :)
Huh?
manoj
--
Man shall never reach
Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (btw severity "important-ish" means severity normal to the BTS - see
> #24255)
Duh; I'm well aware of that, I used it for that reason. Please stop
being so damn condescending and also stop telling me what to do; I'll
do what I want, not what you want
Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Yes, but not all of them, and not to the extent that you could call
> > > it full unattended (NB not unsupervised) autocompiling.
> >
> > Rubbish.
>
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, but not all of them, and not to the extent that you could call
> > it full unattended (NB not unsupervised) autocompiling.
>
> Rubbish.
Would you like to elaborate? Are the packages automatically pu
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think your ad hominems are unjustified and unnecessary, Martin.
Hehe, maybe give credit to manoj for this line. :)
> > You say we now have people helping Guy, who are they?
>
> Richard Braakman and myself.
Fine, well now that Incoming is clear, how a
Hi,
>>"Marco" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marco> On Jul 11, Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We should add PGP or GPG support for dpkg, so that we can include a
>> signature in the deb packages themselves.
Marco> No, we shouldn't do that because we must have an easy
On Jul 11, Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We should add PGP or GPG support for dpkg, so that we can include a
>signature in the deb packages themselves.
No, we shouldn't do that because we must have an easy way to sign a
package when the PGP key is not on the same computer used to bu
8 matches
Mail list logo
