James Troup writes:
> Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Not to speak for him but, I take this to mean auto creation of debs
> > from a central repository. An idea that has been kicked around for
> > a while. With new machines coming RSN we should be able to have one
> > for every ar
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Gecko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Are the even partially possible or are these desirable goals not to be
> > attempted?
>
> My impression from recent conversations was that we were leaning in
> the direction of not having our goals coupled to
Hi,
>>"Marco" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Autocompilation support
Marco> What do we still have to do to support that?
Nothing much, I hope. Now that I am back, I shall be working
on a set of scripts that do just that (my scripts also create a CVS
tree for the sour
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Not to speak for him but, I take this to mean auto creation of debs
> > from a central repository. An idea that has been kicked around for
> > a while. With new machines coming RSN we should be able to have one
>
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Developer controlled automatic archive maintenance (eg removal of
> > packages automatically after GPG signed email with list of
> > packages to delete)
>
> I think this idea, as presented here, is very bad. Even with sanity
> checks and more tho
On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> Guy this is not a slam to you or any of the people who help you.
>
> That said, one of the biggest problems I see facing Debian today and in
> the future is that our list of packages grows daily. A ftp maintainer
> or group of them is a ne
6 matches
Mail list logo
