On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 01:06:11PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > If I may, why is sensable-mda not an /etc/alternatives thing?
>
> The problem is that deliver and procmail take different arguments.
This was pointed out to me on irc.
> > If not present, sendmail is able to deliver itself and if
On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 03:55:16PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > Also gnupg is still alpha software (as the 0.3.0 version number
> > implies), there may well be bugs (in fact, just in the last hour on
> > IRC, we seem to have discovered some) [But then hey, PGP has bugs, and
> > the GNUpg source is
A few of us have been talking about what exactly constitutes a "conf"
file. Would someone with more experience care to weigh in on this.
Basically the question is from debian-mentors and regards whether the
app should look for a app.gtkrc file in /etc or somewhere else. But I
would like a more b
> If I may, why is sensable-mda not an /etc/alternatives thing?
The problem is that deliver and procmail take different arguments.
> If not present, sendmail is able to deliver itself and if present it should
> use the MDA which scores the highest on update-alternatives OR local admin's
> choice
> Clint: what was the prior "perfectly good mechanism"? How did it differ
> from sensible-mda?
The previous method was simply to let the admin configure for the proper MDA.
This was as simple as doing nothing to choose deliver, or adding
FEATURE(local_procmail) to the mc file. Actually, I thin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we possibly change dpkg-buildpackage to check for gpg, and
> then pgp, and not to fall flat on it's face when something is not
> found? Like use gpg by preference, or use pgp if available, or gently
> wanr the use that pgp does not exist
On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Jens Ritter wrote:
> Another problem arises by the "extensive" use of /usr/share. The
> fsstnd says in Section 6.4:
>
> "One note: no program should ever reference anything in /usr/share. For
> instance, a manual page program should never directly look i
On 1 Jul 1998, James Troup wrote:
> [ Replying to myself, whee ]
>
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you want to generate a GNUpg key and send it to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], it'll be added.
>
> For, hopefully obvious, security reasons please PGP sign the mail.
>
> Also gnupg is
On Fri, 3 Jul 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> Jens Ritter wrote:
> > I have a gtk+ based application. You can tweak it´s looks by changing
> > the xlogmaster.gtkrc file. The gimp puts its file in
> > /usr/share/gimp/gtkrc. But I think /etc is the right place to put it
> > in. Am I wrong?
>
> Personally I
9 matches
Mail list logo
