Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, what's the difference?
http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-policy/archive/changelog>
http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-policy/related-docs/upgrading.html>
--
James
G'day All,
Someone asked me why dh_make was using Debian policy 2.3.0.1 and not the
latest and greatest version.
The reason is that I took the code from deb-make and modified it for debhelper.
deb-make had policy 2.3.0.1 and I don't know the difference between the two
versions.
So, what's the d
It appears that some programs in our distribution (see logs for bug
#17361 or #19166 for known examples) are trying to parse other's
output, without ensuring a specific locale.
Such a behaviour can cause obscure failures (eg. dpkg-parsechangelog
in #17361), or even erroneous output (the 'isnative
--
> From: Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Adam P. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
debian-policy@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#19129: sendmail: support PPP links --- use
/etc/ppp/ip-up.d
> Date: Monday, March 09, 1998 9:12
Hi,
>>"Behan" == Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Behan> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I think that nothing should start sending requests off machine
>> behind my back on an upgrade. The Defailt should be OFF. If you
>> like it, turn it on. The behaviour should be to be close to what it
>>
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I feel is missing is official guidelines for was belongs to what
> section.
I would love to see this documented.
For instance, the make-doc package (documentation for make, not a
package for making documentation) is in section doc even though the
m
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> I think that nothing should start sending requests off machine
> behind my back on an upgrade. The Defailt should be OFF. If you like
> it, turn it on. The behaviour should be to be close to what it was
> before.
Instead of shipping with it off, could it be
Hi,
I'd just like to make my position (as ppp maintainer) clear on this ip-up/down
issue (I've been off skiing for a week, so have not been able to get involved
before this).
People seem to be drawing a couple of false conclusions from the fact that I
changed the ip-up/down scripts to use run-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) wrote on 08.03.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Just because I have bind does not mean I want things to be
>> > uploaded, or if I have sendmail that I want
!!! HOOK'EM WITH HUMOR !!!
Would you like to be funnier?
Would you like to command immediate attention?
be someone that others liked instantly?
be the life of the party?
The answer is
The Executive Story Book. Contains 99 clean, humorous
stories used by professional speake
Kai Henningsen writes:
> Bad idea. You forget that du -S only has _directory_ names.
Ah, yes, I did. I was convinced .du files had size info for every
file.
However, if we use .md5sums files, .list files will be useless. A
more generic and standardized format would be better.
--
Yann Dirson
Yann Dirson writes:
> > Let's embrace open standards and open-ended architectures as deeply as we
> > can.
>
> Yep, I didn't think of that, but it's much nicer.
But OTOH, using SGML or XML will probably take more disk-space than
would be strictly necessary. Colon-separated data files are
12 matches
Mail list logo
