Re: PW#5-12: New upload procedure

On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Richard Braakman wrote: > Christian Schwarz wrote: > >7.) [For source uploads only] > >Close bug reports that are fixed with this package upload > >(see below for details). > > I don't know if this has been considered yet: > > It is pretty easy

Re: PW#5-16: Use of /usr/src

Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Furthermore, noone has yet to my knowledge come up with a good > argument as to why we should distribute source code in .deb files, > when we have a much better scheme for source code. The reason for doing this is in those cases where people who under norma

Re: PW#5-12: New upload procedure

Christian Schwarz wrote: >7.) [For source uploads only] >Close bug reports that are fixed with this package upload >(see below for details). I don't know if this has been considered yet: It is pretty easy to close the wrong bug by mistake. Reporting such a mistake

Re: maintainer policy and project organization

On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 12:52:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 12:20:28AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > @packages.debian.org address? > > What do you mean exactly? This is "only" a mapping of the .dsc files. > Humm, I see ... it expands to joey-packages-- ..

Re: Christian Schwarz

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) wrote on 03.02.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Christian Schwarz: > > Well, first of all current policy says ``Every package must have > > exactly one maintainer at a time.'' (see section 2.3.2 The maintainer > > of a package). So this is the case. Whether it `should'

Re: PW#5-12: New upload procedure

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) wrote on 02.02.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ian makes a good point that we shouldn't use different words to refer > to the same action. So I'd go for closes rather than fixes. I just realized, we're talking about adding a state "fixed" to the bug system. Now if we