On Jan 16, Guy Maor wrote:
> Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Chris, who's spammed people with m68k uploads and is currently being
> > spammed by sparc and alpha uploads.
>
> Surely you can program your mailer to throw away the mails about archs
> that you're not interested in?
I
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The idea behind this is the following: Currently, the developer announces
> the upload after having the file uploaded to Incoming. Since dinstall only
> runs once a day there is a slight chance that a severe bug is detected and
> fixed before dinstal
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Packages that contain scripts that use #!/bin/bash should depend on
> bash in case bash becomes a non-essential package
bash will never become nonessential.
Guy
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding the notification about fixed bugs in nmu's: Is it really
> intentional that this way (what Christian and Guy propose) the fixed
> bugs won't be recorded anywhere in the package (since I can't list
> them in the changelog), but would onl
On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 08:04:36PM +, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 06:59:58PM +, James Troup wrote:
>
> > > A quick check shows that ksh also does brace expansion, but (pd)ksh
> > > doesn't.
> >
> > 19:58:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~/temp $ksh
> > $echo {foo,blah}
> > foo blah
> >
On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 10:29:20PM +0100, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> > I can't check with the original post, but personally I think that if a
> > script *does* use bash features then in addition to beginning "#!/bin/bash"
> > it should Depend: on bash.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guy wrote:
> > * If the nmu fixes many bugs, close the bugs, but reopen a new
> > one with the diffs
>
> This is a diff [ ... ]
Please watch your citations, Kai wrote that, not Guy. A
Hello fellow developpers,
I today just found out, that my magicfilter violates the newest policy
by rewritting /etc/printcap, which is lpr|lprng's confile.
What would be the correct solution for this problem? Shall I require that
the lpr|lprng maintainer writes a modify-printcap command, so that I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17.01.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 15 Jan, Guy Maor wrote:
> > Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>Fixes: 98765 98766 9
> >
> > So dinstall will be scanning for this field, and not looking in the
> > changelog? In other words, this will
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought they would only be dynamically linked with libc if the linking
> program or another library had linked against libc. Granted, this should
> be true in almost all cases, but I just wanted to get clarification.
Depends on what you mean by "be dyn
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris, who's spammed people with m68k uploads and is currently being
> spammed by sparc and alpha uploads.
Surely you can program your mailer to throw away the mails about archs
that you're not interested in?
Guy
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guy wrote:
> > * If the nmu fixes many bugs, close the bugs, but reopen a new one
> > with the diffs
>
> This is a diff [ ... ]
Please watch your citations, Kai wrote that, not Guy. And FWIW I
agree with Guy, I do not like the idea of bugs being c
Guy wrote:
> * If the nmu fixes many bugs, close the bugs, but reopen a new one
> with the diffs
This is a diff between the last maintainer release and this nmu ? What about
nmu releases of new upstream versions ? I guess a diff between the last
maintained release and the nmu would make not mu
On 15 Jan 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >3.) [check for new packages every ten minutes]
> >Check if package upload was complete and the files are correct
> >(i.e. check PGP signature, MD5 sums, correct .changes file, etc.
On 15 Jan, Guy Maor wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Fixes: 98765 98766 9
>
> So dinstall will be scanning for this field, and not looking in the
> changelog? In other words, this will only work for people that have
> an updated dpkg-genchanges?
I'd rather
15 matches
Mail list logo
