Re: first implementation of doc-base

> > [I CC this mail to the maintainers of menu, dwww, and dhelp since I don't > know who of them is subscribed to debian-policy. Just tell me and we'll > drop the CCs.] I'm subscribed, but my backlog of (mostly debian related) procmail filtered mail is by now about 70 M. So I appreciate being CC-

Re: Implementation of Developer's DB

Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still not convinced by your arguments. Of course, these packages > are complicated (and another problem might be that we are the > upstream developers of "dpkg" so we'll have to do the coding, too). The same applies to the boot-floppies package

first implementation of doc-base

[I CC this mail to the maintainers of menu, dwww, and dhelp since I don't know who of them is subscribed to debian-policy. Just tell me and we'll drop the CCs.] The basic idea -- Some time ago there was a _big_ discussion about the preferred documentation format in Debian, since the

Re: Implementation of Developer's DB

On 10 Jan 1998, James Troup wrote: [snip] > > Just let me note, that all packages that are currently maintained by > > a group of developers, have a much longer list of outstanding bug > > reports than most one-maintainer packages, for example dpkg, > > boot-floppies, doc-debian containing the FAQ