On Fri, 26 Dec 1997, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Policy is vague; FSSTD is what hamm uses (not FHS!).
Oops. My fault. I mentioned FHS because it's less vague on the subject
than FSSTD. I didn't realize until now that FHS and FSSTD are
conflicting on that subject...
> It is de facto, if not policy,
Adam P. Harris wrote:
> >Seems as if the ldso maintainer and the dpkg maintainer were the two best
> >candidates to providing that explanation.
Cc'd to them.
> Maybe that's not necessary. Rob Browning post got me thinking: even if
> you create the symlink in `debian/tmp/...', order it proper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) wrote on 26.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [You (Kai Henningsen)]
> >What we need most is a coherent explanation of what happens, why it
> >happens, and why the usual strategies are right or wrong.
>
> >Seems as if the ldso maintainer and the dpkg maintainer w
3 matches
Mail list logo
