On Dec 16, 1997, at 17:59, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> On 16-Dec-1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would also like to suggest a print or two. I do not know if this
> > > idea would actually make money, but I would buy one.
> >
> > Uh-oh, you moved this topic from the other m
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Who has authority to mess around with the bug report? From
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.html>, it looks like any
> developer who gets a mind to is "authorized". Is this something that's
> possible but not recommended?
>
> Possible answer
I have a question:
Who has authority to mess around with the bug report? From
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.html>, it looks like any
developer who gets a mind to is "authorized". Is this something that's
possible but not recommended?
Possible answers:
* anyone!
* any debian devel
Sten Anderson:
> >When I run dselect, I see some Emacs packages as seperate deb
> >packages, e.g. auctex. Now, I prefer XEmacs, which includes auctex,
> >but how could I know that? Either make such packages shared between
> >GNU and XEmacs, or write in the control file: GNU Emacs only.
Hmm.. seem
Sten Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus this package fails to put the file in /etc/xemacs/site-start-20.d
> That is probably a bug in dpkg-dev, but how many emacsen are a package
> maintainer supposed to take into account?
Yep, this is a problem. I just sent a mail describing ways I
"Adam P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's uncoordinated? Major Emacsen release versions are going to
> naturally have different localize configurations. I think it would be
> more awkward to try to unify all these (though it could be done -- still,
> what package would the site-s
"Adam P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >In the /etc dir, I have three site-start dirs:
> >/etc/emacs/site-start.d, /etc/xemaxs/site-start-19.d, and
> >/etc/xemacs/site-start-20.d. I haven't touched these dirs (except by
> >installing debs), and now I see their contents differ. We need so
[You (Sten Anderson)]
>Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Feel free to let me know if you have suggestions about how this
>> package should be handled. I'm planning to cooperate with the xemacs
>> and emacs (19) package maintainers to make sure we support the
>> simultaneous installation
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > Some upstream packages place auxiliary executables (i.e., executables
> > which are not called by the user/sysadmin himself) into /usr/libexec or a
> > subdirectory.
>
> I think that executable files are just another form of data. If the user
>
[I've moved this discussion to debian-policy. Please remove the CC to
debian-private when replying.]
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Radu Duta wrote:
> I just ran these two commands.
>
> # ls -al /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.md5sums | wc
> 93 8378367
>
> # ls -al /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list |wc
>
On 16-Dec-1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would also like to suggest a print or two. I do not know if this
> > idea would actually make money, but I would buy one.
>
> Uh-oh, you moved this topic from the other mailing list. Consider your
> knuckles rapped :-) No harm don
11 matches
Mail list logo
