-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been told by a third party that I was rejected from the NM
process. I have never received any message to that effect. My email
has admittedly been unreliable.
It appears that I was removed from the NM database recently, so I assume
that the i
t few weeks) free time to approve
>applicants when they would be stuck in the DAM queue anyway. As that
>queue is almost cleared now, FD approval has moved to the upper regions
>of my TODO list again. The queue will be cleared in the near future.
Cool! Ok :-)
In conclusion, nothing r
e one which has had problems for the longest, the one which has had
the most complaints, and the one with the most overworked people. :-P I'd
trust the Front Desk to create accounts directly.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.veri
. To brainstorm, perhaps someone with 10
advocates should guarantee automatic DAM approval (if they got that far), 20
advocates would guarantee automatic FD approval (if they got that far), and
50 advocates would allow the entire process to be skipped? :-)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTEC
Philipp Kern wrote:
>I thought the stats on the page were broken?
Oh, still? Bletch. I'll go fix it oh, wait, I can't.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Russ Allberry wrote:
>And some things,
>like QA NMUs, aren't really great things to do as an NM, I think.
I have actually done one now (glademm). Not exactly an efficient process, and
I've been deterred from doing a lot of other 'straightforward' NMUs by that.
--
ple who are
not getting treated well in this step -- but the median is worse for DAM
approval, inidicating that this is worse overall for most people. Notably,
the Front Desk is really efficient.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grud
7 matches
Mail list logo
