Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-14 Thread Sven Mueller
On 12/04/2006 22:24, Hubert Chan wrote: > Maybe we need a debian-am-mentors system for AMs, like we have > debian-mentors for maintainers, for when AMs have questions about AM > tasks. > > I remember a suggestion from a long time ago about having new AMs co-AM > with more experienced AMs. It woul

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote: >I don't think having multiple advocates solves >anything; if the problem is that you have a large pool of people acting as >poor advocates, then requiring them to get *two* bad advocates is only >slightly more challenging than getting one. This is only papering over the prob

Re: Reforming the NM process

2006-04-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Lovely, but none of your proposals appear to directly address the major problems you identified: applicants stuck waiting for AM assignment, waiting for their AM to issue a report, waiting for Front Desk to approve, and waiting for DAM approval. Everyone seems to be OK with the actual AM-NM int