* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-17 16:02]:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> >I thought the stats on the page were broken?
> Oh, still? Bletch. I'll go fix it oh, wait, I can't.
They aren't broken. They do exactly what the explanation says they
do, but some people have argued that the
Philipp Kern wrote:
>I thought the stats on the page were broken?
Oh, still? Bletch. I'll go fix it oh, wait, I can't.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fasc
Russ Allberry wrote:
>And some things,
>like QA NMUs, aren't really great things to do as an NM, I think.
I have actually done one now (glademm). Not exactly an efficient process, and
I've been deterred from doing a lot of other 'straightforward' NMUs by that.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTE
On 11/17/05 21:23, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> Anyway about testimonials about NMs: I interpreted this as the job
> of the AM. There is also such a template in the CVS repository. Am
> I wrong about that?
Isn't this the job of the Advocate. You need a DD to recommend you in
the first place. Do we r
On Nov 17, 2005, at 19:59, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Now let's look at the stats for the "queues":
Awaiting AM assignment: median days 131, max days 706
Awaiting FD approval: median days 20, max days 77
Awaiting DAM approval: median days 262, max days 303
I thought the stats on the page were brok
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>It's not a FIFO queue, it's up to the DAM to decide in what order he
>>processes the applicants.
> And is this reasonable? :-P I would say "no". What good reason
> could the DAM have for processing applicants in a non-FIF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>It's not a FIFO queue, it's up to the DAM to decide in what order he
>processes the applicants.
And is this reasonable? :-P I would say "no". What good reason
could the DAM have for processing applicants in a non-FIFO order, apart from
rare special cases? Well, maybe s
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 11:59:45AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > I don't know if it's the case here, but instead of waiting one better
> > makes sure one will get accepted eventually by doing lots of great work
> > and asking a lot of DDs things to get your work done (like sponsoring)
> > so the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes wrote:
> Troy Heber wrote:
>
>>>I understand why there are differences in AM assignment and the FD
>>>queue. However, the process is pretty broken if someone can be waiting
>>>in the DAM queue, this mean having completed everything ask of
9 matches
Mail list logo
