Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11013 March 1977, Daniel James wrote: >> The package name is a little bit too generic - "create". >> And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its >> contents). > How about 'creative-resources' for a package name? Thats way better, and also fits more for what is

Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Daniel James
Hi Joerg, The package name is a little bit too generic - "create". And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). How about 'creative-resources' for a package name? Cheers! Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer, rejected, sorry. The package name is a little bit too generic - "create". And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, r