On 4/30/20 11:19 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Anyway, someone made a other GUI for NSM, it also uses the nsmd server
API, so sessions are 100% compatible with the ones made in the default
NSM GUI.
That will be a more easy candidate to package it in Debian:
https://laborejo.org/argodejo/
S
pstream developer is less responsive lately.
For more skilled people in this realm there are certainly some options
here though, especially if you decide to only package
non-session-manager (NSM).
It might then be best to split of the non-session-manager in it's own
repo and make it build wit
Hi,
I came to the conclusion that I'm not able to get this project done,
also because upstream developer is less responsive lately.
For more skilled people in this realm there are certainly some options
here though, especially if you decide to only package
non-session-manager (NSM).
On 3/7/20 11:30 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
what really turns*me* away from non, is the use of WAF as the buildsystem.
quote from upstream developer:
"There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the
shipped WAF binary is. I think it should be in a goo
here's a couple of packages that are part of the default Ubuntu
Studio installation)
- that, because Ubuntu Studio already has a similar package (RaySession)
in the default installation, Non-Session-Manager will not be part of the
default Ubuntu Studio installation? (again: fine; nobody as
On 3/7/20 11:30 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
also, the only tags upstream did in their repository, is about 3 years
ago, so their hint that we can get tarballs from github is pretty
useless. (unless we consider that the software was dormant in the last
years).
Yes, less active in
the default Ubuntu
Studio installation)
- that, because Ubuntu Studio already has a similar package (RaySession)
in the default installation, Non-Session-Manager will not be part of the
default Ubuntu Studio installation? (again: fine; nobody asked for that)
- that Non-Session-Manager will never be
On 3/7/20 11:19 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> https://github.com/original-male/non
>
thanks, but how is one to find that from the homepage?
(in theory, that could just be some impostor).
also, the only tags upstream did in their repository, is about 3 years
ago, so their hint that we can get ta
On 3/7/20 11:17 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 3/6/20 9:00 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
/"You can get a tarball from a tag on github.
true, and this is what many projects i maintain for Debian do.
but how does github relate to packaging non-*?
their homepage does not seem to
On 3/6/20 9:00 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> /"You can get a tarball from a tag on github.
true, and this is what many projects i maintain for Debian do.
but how does github relate to packaging non-*?
their homepage does not seem to mention that they are using github in
any way, instead the
Hi Rosea,
On 06/03/2020 21:54, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> Does someone wants to package NSM without NTK, but with purely FLTK for
> Debian?
>
>
> I've good contacts with upstream developer, so I'm able to help to get
> things clear for packaging, like I proved already with the quote above ;)
On 06-03-2020 21:00, rosea.grammostola wrote:
I asked if it would be a idea to package NSM without the non-toolkit
first, so with FLTK:
/"Totally reasonable. Again, I'm 99% sure that NSM's GUI doesn't use
any NTK specific features or controls."/
This would mean that 'we' would package NSM
Got some replies from upstream dev
/"You can get a tarball from a tag on github. Plus, I thought all
packagers have been doing things straight from git (no tarballs) for
like half a decade now. I can't remember the last time I touched a
tarball..."/
On 06-03-2020 19:07, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 06-03-2020 19:17, Ross Gammon wrote:
Sorry - I forgot to add. Such a complicated package might not be a good
idea for you first package. There are plenty of other Debian Multimedia
packages that need some love. You could start with an easier one, and
come back to non-* later.
Thanks Ross,
Hi Rosea,
On 06/03/2020 19:07, Ross Gammon wrote:
>
> When learning packaging in Debian, I highly recommend using Debian Mentors:
> https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> On the Mentors mailing list, you will find many kind people willing to
> help answers those silly beginner questions.
Hi Rosea,
I looked at helping Jaromir package NTK a long time ago, and looked at
packaging the non-* applications more recently. KX-Studio have managed
to package them. But now that Erich has packaged Raysession in Ubuntu, I
am not in so much of a hurry.
I think Jonas is right. It is not impossib
Quoting rosea.grammostola (2020-03-06 16:56:52)
> I absolutely can't imagine that NSM can't get it into Debian. I'm
> determined to proof if. Any help to help me proof it would be
> appreciated. ;)
I agree it sounds quite odd if NSM cannot be packaged for Debian.
I am already overloaded with pr
Hi rosea,
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 16:42 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'll contact the main developer about this
> and
> report back.
>
> On 06-03-2020 16:27, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote:
> > In Ubuntu, I have packaged and included RaySession, which is
> > compl
On 06-03-2020 16:49, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
API compatible does not mean session compatible. It means that it
interacts with applications that are NSM ready. It's not meant to load
sessions from NSM. That's the misconception. I've heard the objections,
but unless the Non-* developers m
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I'll contact the main developer about this and
report back.
On 06-03-2020 16:27, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In Ubuntu, I have packaged and included RaySession, which is completely
API compatible with NSM and uses Qt as opposed to NTK. You can see it
at https://la
Hi rosea,
I hate to say this, but you're probably going to get nothing but
complete silence on this one.
I have tried to package Non-Session-Manager, but the source code is
done in a way that is incompatible with Debian packaging. They don't
release source tarballs for their releases
Let's turn it around. Is there someone who can help me with packaging
Non-Session-Manager for Debian? My knowledge is lacking and certainly
not up-to-date.
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/Non%20Session%20Manager
First question: do I need a Debian install for this, or can I use Ubuntu
to package this non-session-manager?
>
> Would be a great addition to the audio packages in Debian.
>
> The bugreport is here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950923
>
> Regards,
>
> \r
>
>
> On 08-02-2020 10:58, rosea.grammostola wro
Hi all,
Someone who wants to package this non-session-manager?
Would be a great addition to the audio packages in Debian.
The bugreport is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950923
Regards,
\r
On 08-02-2020 10:58, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The
flexibility of JACK
<http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/JACK>.
The components of Non work together and separately, allowing you create
a studio tailored to your own needs.
- Non-Session-Manager
The Non Session Manager is an API and an (GUI) implementation for
session management in the context of
Hi Rosea,
Quoting rosea.grammostola (2020-02-08 10:58:25)
> The Non-Session-Manager is a important application when you want to
> use audio applications on Linux to make music. The Non Session Manager
> is an API and an implementation for session management. It stores and
> r
Hi,
The Non-Session-Manager is a important application when you want to use
audio applications on Linux to make music. The Non Session Manager is an
API and an implementation for session management. It stores and restores
JACK connections, applications in the session and it's state. When y
27 matches
Mail list logo
