Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

> > > Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my > > > first tries to rebuild all the packages are at > > > . > > > > Yikes, I've noticed that you've actually done the upload. > > I said so in > >

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi Junichi! On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > I support uploading of newer jack version. > > > > Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my > > first tries to rebuild all the packages are at > > . > > Yikes, I'v

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

> > > I support uploading of newer jack version. > > Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my > first tries to rebuild all the packages are at > . Yikes, I've noticed that you've actually done the upload. ecasound2.2 is goi

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:34:10PM +0100, guenter geiger wrote: > Unfortunately the problems with muse will affect the whole jack chain ... > I wasn't aware that muse didn't make it into testing together with the > other jack-applications :( Yep, unfortunate timing of the fluidsynth upload. But if

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Daniel Kobras wrote: > Please don't upload a new version of muse until the present one is in > testing. It used to be blocked by jack, these days it's stalled by the > new fluidsynth. pkg-muse CVS on alioth has a basically ready-to-roll > Debian package of 0.6.2. 0.6.3 should b

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:53PM +0100, guenter geiger wrote: > I can take muse, I have packaged the new upstream version and converted it > to cdbs. Daniel, I will give you an URL soon, so you can comment on it. > (forgot how to login into alioth ... have to aquire a new > password, I think ) P

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my > first tries to rebuild all the packages are at > . > > muse libhydrogen and spiralsynthmodular failed because of the > jack_nframes_t type c

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi Junichi! On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I support uploading of newer jack version. Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my first tries to rebuild all the packages are at . muse libhydrogen and spiralsynthmo

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi, Nice to see jack has finally gone in to testing. I support uploading of newer jack version. However, I do doubt it's going to be the last ABI-incompatible release. regards, junichi

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi, On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 15:58, Robert Jordens wrote: > During the 0-day-NMU phase this was not needed. Failure to satisfy > build-dependencies in unstable is release-critical. We can do regular > NMUs after waiting for lets say a week and then we can do 1-week-delayed > uploads (I hope we can si

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hello! [Wed, 14 Jan 2004] guenter geiger wrote: > Its good news that the API didn't change between 0.80.0 and 0.94.0, > unfortunately we have 0.75.0 in testing, which is not compatible. > > This means that if we update jack and related packages now, we will > have the same problem that we had wit

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > We had a request from Junichi for a "mini-freeze" around JACK in > November. I don't know if that really is still valid because the goal of > that freeze is reached and the timetable for the release changed a lot. > I think we can do it and push another

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hello! [Mon, 12 Jan 2004] guenter geiger wrote: > Looks good to me - only did some barebone tests, qjackctl and ladcca > compiled against 0.80.0 work. > > Anyhow, now that 0.75.0 is in testing we can go ahead and upload > to unstable directly. Jack related packages will have to be > recompiled an

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi Robert, Looks good to me - only did some barebone tests, qjackctl and ladcca compiled against 0.80.0 work. Anyhow, now that 0.75.0 is in testing we can go ahead and upload to unstable directly. Jack related packages will have to be recompiled anyhow, as 0.80.0 was only in experimental. Can y

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hello! > Great! I'm going to try it ASAP (tomorrow, I think). > > P.S.: do you keep your packaging work under CVS or something like > that? In my local (offline) subversion repository. Hmm. If there is really need, I'll move it to svn.debian.org. Robert. -- It was kinda like stuffing

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi! > "rj" == Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: rj> Hi! I suggest the following new JACK package: rj> http://people.debian.org/~jordens/debs/new-jack/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.91.1-1_i386.changes Great! I'm going to try it ASAP (tomorrow, I think). P.S.: do you keep y

JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi! I suggest the following new JACK package: http://people.debian.org/~jordens/debs/new-jack/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.91.1-1_i386.changes jack-audio-connection-kit (0.91.1-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream release + does not break binary compatibility + enable expe