Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-12-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 15:37]: > On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi Ardour maintainers, > > Did someone of you already look into: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597? > > I ask because this is the only thing missi

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-12-04 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Ardour maintainers, > Did someone of you already look into: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597? > I ask because this is the only thing missing from fixing the > security flaw in ardour described on: > http://bugs.debia

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-27 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-27 11:53]: > On Friday 26 October 2007 14:52:00 Nico Golde wrote: [...] > > + [ Delete ('$PREFIX/etc/ardour2'), > > + Delete ('$PREFIX/lib/ardour2'), > > +

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Friday 26 October 2007 14:52:00 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-26 18:50]: > > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > > > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > > > solve this, they added some uninstall r

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-26 18:50]: > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > > solve this, they added some uninstall rule referring to > > upstream. > > What revision? I can't see an

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > solve this, they added some uninstall rule referring to > upstream. What revision? I can't see anything in the websvn at http://viewcvs.ardour.org/log.php?repname=Ardour&path=%

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-23 17:06]: > On 10/23/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > I've been looking into this. The pkg-config issue is trivial, a pkg-config > > > build-dep was missing. > > > > Are you sure about this? I don't really think so I th

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-23 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 10/23/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Felipe, > * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-23 10:22]: > > On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote: > > > Hi Ardour maintainers, > > > Did someone of you already look into: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-23 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-23 10:22]: > On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi Ardour maintainers, > > Did someone of you already look into: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597? > > I ask because this is the only thing missi

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Ardour maintainers, > Did someone of you already look into: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597? > I ask because this is the only thing missing from fixing the > security flaw in ardour described on: > http://bugs.debia

FTBS of ardour

2007-10-21 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Ardour maintainers, Did someone of you already look into: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597? I ask because this is the only thing missing from fixing the security flaw in ardour described on: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445889 Kind regards Nico -- N