[sorry, I messed the headers in the previous message, so I repost after
cancelling the pending messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and linux-audio-dev]
[after exchanging a few personal messages with Andrea, we decided I
should post here, although I already raised my points in the discussion
that led to
[after exchanging a few personal messages with Andrea, we decided I
should post here, although I already raised my points in the discussion
that led to this draft. Now I notice a "reply-to" set to users@ in the
original message, so I might have lost most discussion. I keep all the
Cc: list as Andr
|| On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:09:44 +0200
|| Andrea Glorioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ag> What does `endorsement' precisely mean, in this context?
Public support.
Regards,
Georg
--
Georg C. F. Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Free Software Foundation Europe
> "Georg" == Georg C F Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People could conclude from it that the FSFE somehow forced the
> AGNULA project into the "remaining free" stance and the
> volunteers have no problem with it at the moment.
> Alternative wording might be:
> After
Dear Andrea,
I've been thinking about this a little more and think there is a
fundamental problem with the reasoning by denominating firmware as
software and making an exception for it.
Making such an exception would not only violate the AGNULA trademark
license, it would also open the door to al
|| On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:08:36 +0200
|| Andrea Glorioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ag> [...]
ag> After the end of the funded lifetime, AGNULA has become a
ag> (mostly) volunteer project; however, FSFE has registered the
ag> "AGNULA" trademark and allows it to be used only by projects
ag>
Dear all,
after a very busy period I finally managed to find the needed time and
concentration to write the first darft of AGNULA position on
distributing ALSA firmware.
To make a long story short, the final position I'm proposing is that
AGNULA *should* distribute such firmware, but
7 matches
Mail list logo
