Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

2004-03-25 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Wed, 24 Mar 2004] Jack O'Quin wrote: > They should be, and they usually are, but it's not guaranteed. With > autoconf, users need not have the full developer tool chain installed. > So, it's important that all the front-end generated files be up to > date. Debian deals with these issues

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

2004-03-24 Thread Jack O'Quin
Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Tue, 23 Mar 2004] Jack O'Quin wrote: > > I always run `make' before `make dist' or `make distcheck'. I do that > > to ensure that all distributed files are up-to-date. This is what the > > "Goat Book" (_GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool_) recommend

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

2004-03-24 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Tue, 23 Mar 2004] Jack O'Quin wrote: > > it works after building it in the cvs checkout dir and then doing make > > dist. > > I always run `make' before `make dist' or `make distcheck'. I do that > to ensure that all distributed files are up-to-date. This is what the > "Goat Book" (_GNU

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

2004-03-23 Thread Jack O'Quin
Robert Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Make dist doesn't work from a fresh checkout/autogen.sh: > > * depcomp is missing in CVS in config/ AFAICS > * files/links seem to be missing for the config includes. make dist > fails from a fresh checkout ... > it works after building it in the cv