Hi Junichi,
|--==> Free Ekanayaka writes:
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Can you wait until etch release please ? This will mean binaries
JU> compiled on sid will have a different SONAME requirements, so will no
JU> longer work on etch. Right ?
>>>
>>>No they will still work, as the
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Can you wait until etch release please ? This will mean binaries
JU> compiled on sid will have a different SONAME requirements, so will no
JU> longer work on etch. Right ?
>>
>>No they will still work, as the SONAME is unchanged with respect to
>>th
> JU> Can you wait until etch release please ? This will mean binaries
> JU> compiled on sid will have a different SONAME requirements, so will no
> JU> longer work on etch. Right ?
>
> No they will still work, as the SONAME is unchanged with respect to
> the jack version in etch, it's st
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,
>>I've doubled checked the new packages, both on amd64 and i386, and I
>>confirm that the work fine, without breaking other packages (this
>>0.102.20 upstream release was also includedin the recent 1.0 64
>>Studio release, and no bug re
Hi,
> I've doubled checked the new packages, both on amd64 and i386, and I
> confirm that the work fine, without breaking other packages (this
> 0.102.20 upstream release was also includedin the recent 1.0 64
> Studio release, and no bug reports have come so far).
>
> So if everybo
Hi all,
|--==> Free Ekanayaka writes:
FE> Hi Junichi,
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,
>>>http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/jack-audio-connection-kit/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
>>>
>>>and tested the new packages on amd64. Everything seems to work fine,
>>>and upgrades from the
Hi Junichi,
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,
>>http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/jack-audio-connection-kit/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
>>
>>and tested the new packages on amd64. Everything seems to work fine,
>>and upgrades from the previous packages are possible through the dummy
Hi,
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/jack-audio-connection-kit/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
>
> and tested the new packages on amd64. Everything seems to work fine,
> and upgrades from the previous packages are possible through the dummy
> packages I've added in debian/control.
>
> If everythin
Hi all,
I've a prepared a second revision of the jack 0.102.20 release, which
I uploaded to experimental a while ago
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/sound/jackd
This newrevision drops the patchesapplied to the upstream
configure.in and and hence fixes #353680. As the
Hi Junichi,
On 12/9/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> If so I think we could drop these patches:
>
>
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/jack-audio-connection-kit/trunk/debian/patches/02_release-in-libjack-name.patch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/jack-
Hi Robert,
> On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 18:00 +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
>> The original versioning scheme was decided upon by Junichi and me mainly
>> due to lines 40-42 in the configure.ac file. The policy was stressed
>> many times on the jack mailing list.
>
> The real reason for keeping the vers
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 18:00 +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> The original versioning scheme was decided upon by Junichi and me mainly
> due to lines 40-42 in the configure.ac file. The policy was stressed
> many times on the jack mailing list.
The real reason for keeping the version in the package n
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:36 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I'm sorry but I have to bother you again with the versioning issue of
> the jack package.
> Here below is a copy of the reply I sent to Paul Davis on the Jack
> mailing list. It seems that this issue is making life harder for
> p
I'm sorry but I have to bother you again with the versioning issue of
the jack package.
Here below is a copy of the reply I sent to Paul Davis on the Jack
mailing list. It seems that this issue is making life harder for
people wanting to compile and run bleeding-edge versions of jack.
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo
