It's reported to me that it is fixed in git.
https://sourceforge.net/p/qmidiarp/code/ci/master/tree/
The git version of AMS works fine
https://sourceforge.net/p/alsamodular/ams.git/ci/master/tree/
The git version of AMS works fine in NSM
https://sourceforge.net/p/alsamodular/ams.git/ci/master/tree/
Upstream has the same bug. I'll report it upstream here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/qmidiarp/bugs/34/
But I'm not using the app atm, so I'm probably not going to spend time
on it tbh. Lots of Linuxaudio apps have bugs unfortunately, I report
them, but if I've to trace down them all, it will be
Now I reinstalled using the version from Debian repo (it's now in
testing). Same problem.
Now I reinstalled using the version from Debian repo (it's now in
testing). Same problem.
In Non/New-Session-manager (NSM) it launches, but it does that with
twice instances
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976268
Hi,
I reported a NSM (non/new-session-manager) related bug here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975375
It looks like it could be easily fixed by adding liblo-dev as build
dependency (see last additional info).
Would be nice if that could be fixed.
Thanks,
\r
On 4/30/20 11:19 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Anyway, someone made a other GUI for NSM, it also uses the nsmd server
API, so sessions are 100% compatible with the ones made in the default
NSM GUI.
That will be a more easy candidate to package it in Debian:
https://laborejo.org/argodejo
t with the JACK. It's very lightweight
software, so it would also be a great candidate for Raspbian.
http://non.tuxfamily.org/
Cheers.
\r
On 4/29/20 11:10 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
I came to the conclusion that I'm not able to get this project done,
also because u
Ubuntu and last but not least Raspbian.
See also notes here:
https://github.com/original-male/non/issues/280
Regards,
\r
On 2/28/20 10:47 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
If I can help someone, with this job, I'm willing too, all though I've
not much packaging experience. I know the so
On 3/10/20 12:43 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
Upstream developer wonders whether statically linking is allowed in Debian:
"What I was referring to is not having an NTK package at all. NTK would
have to be compiled during the NSM build and NSM statically linked to
it, which means that (the relevant p
(I've also sent this to debian-mentor, but no reply yet, thought this
might be interesting for debian multimedia as well, sorry for the
cross-posting)
Hi,
Package: Non-daw https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/
Depend on: a fork of FLTK, NTK. https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/fltk.git/
Upstream
On 3/7/20 11:30 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
what really turns*me* away from non, is the use of WAF as the buildsystem.
quote from upstream developer:
"There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the
shipped WAF binary is. I think it should be in a goo
On 3/7/20 11:35 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 3/6/20 4:49 PM, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
RaySession is in Ubuntu and is part of the default
Ubuntu Studio install, and that's final.
honestly, i don't know what to make of this.
to me, it sounds quite aggressive towards the O
On 3/7/20 11:30 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
also, the only tags upstream did in their repository, is about 3 years
ago, so their hint that we can get tarballs from github is pretty
useless. (unless we consider that the software was dormant in the last
years).
Yes, less active in
On 3/7/20 11:17 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 3/6/20 9:00 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
/"You can get a tarball from a tag on github.
true, and this is what many projects i maintain for Debian do.
but how does github relate to packaging non-*?
their homepage does not se
On 06-03-2020 21:00, rosea.grammostola wrote:
I asked if it would be a idea to package NSM without the non-toolkit
first, so with FLTK:
/"Totally reasonable. Again, I'm 99% sure that NSM's GUI doesn't use
any NTK specific features or controls."/
This would mea
Got some replies from upstream dev
/"You can get a tarball from a tag on github. Plus, I thought all
packagers have been doing things straight from git (no tarballs) for
like half a decade now. I can't remember the last time I touched a
tarball..."/
On 06-03-2020 19:07, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 06-03-2020 19:17, Ross Gammon wrote:
Sorry - I forgot to add. Such a complicated package might not be a good
idea for you first package. There are plenty of other Debian Multimedia
packages that need some love. You could start with an easier one, and
come back to non-* later.
Thanks Ross,
On 06-03-2020 16:49, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
API compatible does not mean session compatible. It means that it
interacts with applications that are NSM ready. It's not meant to load
sessions from NSM. That's the misconception. I've heard the objections,
but unless the Non-* developers m
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I'll contact the main developer about this and
report back.
On 06-03-2020 16:27, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In Ubuntu, I have packaged and included RaySession, which is completely
API compatible with NSM and uses Qt as opposed to NTK. You can see it
at https://la
18.04?
Regards,
\r
On 28-02-2020 22:47, rosea.grammostola wrote:
If I can help someone, with this job, I'm willing too, all though I've
not much packaging experience. I know the software and have good contact
with the developer. Which might make things more easy.
On 28-02-2020 15:50, ro
If I can help someone, with this job, I'm willing too, all though I've
not much packaging experience. I know the software and have good contact
with the developer. Which might make things more easy.
On 28-02-2020 15:50, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Someone who wants
Hi all,
Someone who wants to package this non-session-manager?
Would be a great addition to the audio packages in Debian.
The bugreport is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950923
Regards,
\r
On 08-02-2020 10:58, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The
sorry, but does this mean the package will be removed from Debian? That
would be a shame, it's important software.
Forwarded Message
Subject:supercollider is marked for autoremoval from testing
Resent-Date:Sun, 9 Feb 2020 04:57:38 + (UTC)
Resent-From:debian
Package: non-daw
Severity: RFP
Description:
Non is a modular DAW. Modular in the Unix sense. This is unique. Other
DAWs, even in the free-software realm, are large, bloated, and, as a
rule, monolithic. This goes against the Unix philosophy and fails to
take full advantage of the power and flexibi
Hi,
The Non-Session-Manager is a important application when you want to use
audio applications on Linux to make music. The Non Session Manager is an
API and an implementation for session management. It stores and restores
JACK connections, applications in the session and it's state. When you
re-o
On 05/27/2013 01:42 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Note, some packages are not in Debian yet! But I think they're important for
the future of linuxaudio in Debian:
- Ardour3
- non-mixer http://non.tuxfamily.org/
- non-timeline
- non-session-manager
- non-sequencer
- carla http://kxstudio.sourceforg
On 05/24/2013 06:30 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm not quite sure of the usefulness of the ladi task, to be honest.
I've removed the non and ladi task.
I think 'audio-plugins' should be 'softsynths or virtual instruments'.
Then you've to think about where to put the LV2 and DSSI plugins.
S
On 05/22/2013 11:35 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2013 05:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Felipe (and others, I guess),
On Montag, 20. Mai 2013, Felipe Sateler wrote
On 05/22/2013 05:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Felipe (and others, I guess),
On Montag, 20. Mai 2013, Felipe Sateler wrote:
They are currently in the NEW queue, should reach
On 05/20/2013 07:17 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm hesitant to actually build and upload the metapackages
I've just uploaded them today. I expect/hope to get a lot of feedback
on how inappropriate they are ;).
Any comments/improvements are
On 12/04/2012 02:10 PM, Aurélien Roux wrote:
Le 04/12/2012 13:20, rosea.grammostola a écrit :
On 12/04/2012 12:51 PM, Aurélien Roux wrote:
Le 22/11/2012 09:24, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Aurélien Roux wrote:
Hi!
Been kind of mute this last days. I didn&#
On 12/04/2012 12:51 PM, Aurélien Roux wrote:
Le 22/11/2012 09:24, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Aurélien Roux wrote:
Hi!
Been kind of mute this last days. I didn't give up about it, but I
had to
think about it, read some doc (a lot actually, in the bunch of links
On 11/14/2012 12:41 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:54 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
* The Debian Multimedia Team spoke about plans to have a backport repo in
the past. I'm sure they're willing to help you here
On 11/14/2012 08:49 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:27:42AM +0100, Aurélien - Chargé de Porn - AMMD
wrote:
* I've to say that I am by now not really sure about the answer I
should give to the "Are you the good person for that project?"
question in the Debian Blends doc!
On 11/13/2012 11:27 AM, Aurélien - Chargé de Porn - AMMD wrote:
I finally would distinguish two "extreme"-kind of end-users for that
domain:
- the ones wanting something that works out of the box, with package
preinstalled, nice look and feel, and that won't trust you that it's
possible to have a
On 11/13/2012 11:49 AM, Aurélien - Chargé de Porn - AMMD wrote:
Le 12/11/2012 15:55, Adrian Knoth a écrit :
On 11/11/2012 03:14 PM, Aurelien wrote:
Hi all of you,
Hi!
I don't have the time to follow the discussion closely, so I'll limit
myself to a single point:
- avoiding pulseaudio by d
On 11/12/2012 12:03 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 11/12/2012 11:53 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
In my opinion you need
1) debian blend metapackages
Allows people to install packages for a certain task, like 'recording'
'mixing' etc.
2) A stable repo with backported
On 11/12/2012 03:55 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On 11/11/2012 03:14 PM, Aurelien wrote:
Hi all of you,
Hi!
I don't have the time to follow the discussion closely, so I'll limit
myself to a single point:
- avoiding pulseaudio by default
AFAIKS, there is absolutely nothing wrong with pulseaud
What you want here is to provide the users the best technical
environment to get his work done. I think a much better solution would
be a something like a wizard that examines your system installation,
educates the user about the findings, and then does specific
recommendations (ideally with "fix
On 11/12/2012 01:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26:14PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
We discussed the option of having conflicts in metapackages several
times. If I remember correctly the main drawback is that users who
really really want to have pulseaudio need to dei
On 11/12/2012 11:53 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
In my opinion you need
1) debian blend metapackages
Allows people to install packages for a certain task, like 'recording'
'mixing' etc.
2) A stable repo with backported packages from Debian testing/unstable
(2a) opt
Hi,
In my opinion you need
1) debian blend metapackages
Allows people to install packages for a certain task, like 'recording'
'mixing' etc.
2) A stable repo with backported packages from Debian testing/unstable
(2a) optional an custom repo with packages which are not allowed in Debian.
3)
Andreas,
On 10/30/2010 03:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
[I hope you do not mind if I quote you on a public list but to my
understanding nothing in the mail is really private.]
It was a message to you and not meant to be public. Not a very big deal
to me either.
For my understanding there is
46 matches
Mail list logo
