Bug#1039457: mplayer: reproducible-builds: version differences caused by /bin/sh implementations

2023-06-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 19:12:59 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The patch to debian/rules fixes this by using a single printf call > instead of two echo calls, and adjusting the escaped strings > accordingly. ... > + printf "$(OUR_VERSION)\n$(OUR_TITLE)\n" >> version.h This is sub-optimal beca

Re: Bug#1026624: mpv-mpris: FTBFS: mpris.c:1:10: fatal error: gio/gio.h: No such file or directory

2022-12-20 Thread Paul Wise
Control: reassign -1 libmpv-dev Control: affects -1 src:mpv-mpris Control: retitle -1 libmpv-dev: missing dependency on wayland-protocols On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 18:16 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [mpv-mpris] failed to build on amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): ... > > Package wayland-protoc

Bug#1020931: fixed in sord 0.16.14-2

2022-10-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 08:53 +0200, Dennis Braun wrote: > Thanks a lot :-) Yes i will update the package with PCRE2 asap. Please note that upstream does not intend to make a release for this and requests that the change be tested and confirmed working, so probably the best way would be to package

Bug#1020931: fixed in sord 0.16.14-2

2022-10-07 Thread Paul Wise
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch Control: forwarded -1  https://github.com/drobilla/sord/commit/67bcd63bda9d7b095489a09b9880aa730ddb5488 https://github.com/drobilla/sord/issues/6 On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:05:52 + Dennis Braun wrote: >* Drop optional Build-Depends libpcre++-dev (Close

Bug#1021291: sord: broken Homepage link

2022-10-04 Thread Paul Wise
Source: sord Version: 0.16.14-2 Severity: minor User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: duck I noticed that the upstream website is missing and the new location is available at this address: https://drobilla.net/software/sord.html $ apt-cache showsrc sord | grep Homepage Homepage: ht

Bug#1014594: muse: FTBFS on riscv64

2022-07-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 13:46 +, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > The attached patch fixes the issue, and I will create a merge request > on the salsa repo at https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/muse. This patch introduces an embedded copy of CheckAtomic.cmake from the extra-cmake-modules packag

Re: Bug#994165: pipewire: add pipewire-alsa/pipewire-jack packages

2021-10-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 15:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > libjack0-pipewire (Multi-Arch: same): > libasound2-pipewire (Multi-Arch: same): Please use pipewire-jack/pipewire-alsa for consistency and ease of use. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is

Bug#992549: libuemf0: libuemf.so: needs to link with -lm

2021-08-19 Thread Paul Wise
Package: libuemf0 Version: 0.2.8+ds-2 Severity: minor File: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuemf.so.0.0.3 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: undefined-symbol adequate libuemf.so needs to link with libm.so, see the output of adequate, symtree and objdump below. I detected this on amd64 but th

Bug#990737: Audacity's new privacy policy may need to be addressed

2021-07-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:47:40 +1200 martin f krafft wrote: > This may need addressing in the Debian packaging, i.e. in addition > to ensuring that the data collection is off by default, maybe the > whole tracking code needs to be removed? IIRC the telemetry is off by default when building from so

Bug#979668: pulseeffects: please build with rnnoise plugin

2021-05-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:58:21 +0300 Roman Lebedev wrote: > It would appear that rnnoise itself isn't packaged in Debian presently, > though. rnnoise was trained using proprietary data, more details here: https://bugs.debian.org/980839 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.a

Bug#986733: Support for pipewire

2021-04-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:13:18 +0200 Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Would the current package/build already work with pipewire, or would > pulseeffects require a different package entirely? Support for PipeWire requires upgrading to PulseEffects 5.x and doing so will drop support for pulseaudio, which is onl

Bug#923940: [libtheoraenc] What resolution were you looking for?

2020-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 23:30 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > good to hear transitive linking can be assumed to work these days! It has worked for as long as I have been around Debian (since ~2005). > This is fixed in upstream git with a line in lib/Makefile.am: > >

Bug#923940: [libtheoraenc] What resolution were you looking for?

2020-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 22:17 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > Looking at this bug, I don't understand what exactly you're reporting. I'm reporting underlinking at the ELF file level. > libtheoraenc does depend on libtheoradec, so applications need to > link to both. This is declared in the pkg-config

Bug#941053: gem: switch from libglewmx-dev to libglew-dev

2019-09-23 Thread Paul Wise
Source: gem Version: 1:0.94-1 Severity: wishlist I'd like to remove glewmx from Debian since upstream removed MX support from GLEW a long time ago and doesn't plan to re-add MX support. https://github.com/nigels-com/glew/issues/38 https://github.com/nigels-com/glew/releases Please switch the Bui

Bug#923940: libtheoraenc.so: undefined symbols: needs -ltheoradec

2019-03-07 Thread Paul Wise
Package: libtheora0 Version: 1.1.1+dfsg.1-15 Severity: minor File: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblvm2cmd.so.2.03 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: undefined-symbol adequate libtheoraenc.so needs to link with -ltheoradec, see the output of adequate, symtree and objdump below. I detected this on

Bug#898342: libUsageEnvironment.so: undefined symbols: needs -lliveMedia

2018-05-10 Thread Paul Wise
Package: libusageenvironment3 Version: 2018.04.25-2 Severity: minor File: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libUsageEnvironment.so.3.1.0 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: undefined-symbol adequate libUsageEnvironment.so needs to link with -lliveMedia, see the output of adequate, symtree and objdu

Re: Web sentinel possible for "foreign" repositories (Was: Presentation + A debian-based for audio creation and production, stage technics and video blend (or "the future of TangoStudio"))

2012-12-09 Thread Paul Wise
I don't think "openstudio" can be considered a Debian Pure Blend yet, the metapackages aren't in Debian or even in NEW yet. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Re: Presentation + A debian-based for audio creation and production, stage technics and video blend (or "the future of TangoStudio")

2012-11-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:54 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: > * The Debian Multimedia Team spoke about plans to have a backport repo in > the past. I'm sure they're willing to help you here. Do you mean something different to the Debian backports repo? http://backports.debian.org/ -- bye, pabs

Re: Presentation + A debian-based for audio creation and production, stage technics and video blend (or "the future of TangoStudio")

2012-11-12 Thread Paul Wise
Sorry for replying to the initial mail but I just wanted to address some things that were said in the thread without sending a bajillion replies (wow, didn't expect the thread to get so long!). Conflicts are a bad idea since you force people to not use things even if they want to. In the case of p

Re: Presentation + A debian-based for audio creation and production, stage technics and video blend (or "the future of TangoStudio")

2012-11-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Aurelien wrote: > To end up, we're currently listing all the features that were in > TangoStudio and that appear to us as "essentials" for that type of > audio/lights/video specialised users. The list is not complete by now, > but clearly, it has to deal with: > >

Re: closing down debian-multimedia alioth project and l.d.o list?

2009-12-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:45:07 -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki > said: > >  EDR> As mentioned briefly in the IRC meeting today, there is not much to >  EDR> discuss about whether or not to do this. I'm just curious to find out >  EDR> how

Bug#490135: RFP: fdmf -- find duplicate music files

2008-07-09 Thread Paul Wise
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org * Package name: fdmf Version : 0.0.9r Upstream Author : Kurt Rosenfeld * URL : http://w140.com/audio/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C, Perl Description

Bug#487642: openmovieeditor: uses depreciated img_convert function, please port to libswscale

2008-06-23 Thread Paul Wise
Package: openmovieeditor Version: 0.0.20080102-2.1+b1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: img-convert The following files in your package appear to use the img_convert function, which has been depreciated by ffmpeg upstream in favour of their newer libswscale library. /usr/bin/o

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Consider that the Ardour team do not want to be receiving bug reports > > for years into the future from Debian, Ubuntu and other Debian > > derivative distro users about problems which are not present in their > > own c

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to have a go at killing all these libraries right now, but > someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about > the evilness of embedded code copies. I thought this w

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-01 Thread Paul Wise
I'm going to have a go at killing all these libraries right now, but someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about the evilness of embedded code copies. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Daniel James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any way we can resolve this? Can we just get security support > removed so that the embedding of libraries is no longer an issue? Security isn't the only reason embedded libraries are bad. > I seriously doubt t

Re: Multimedia Teams in Debian

2008-04-22 Thread Paul Wise
I'd like to see the alioth projects merged too: http://alioth.debian.org/projects/demudi/ http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-multimedia/ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Re: RFS: fluid-soundfont -- Fluid (R3) General MIDI SoundFont

2008-02-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Tomas Nykung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > strings FluidR3_GM.sf2 |grep -i distribute > > DO NOT REDISTRIBUTE ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. > > Wow. The package has been uploaded, but if it gets

Re: CinePaint removed from testing

2008-02-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Robin Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aedan Kelly has made some CinePaint GTK2 debs and may be able to take on > being our Debian maintainer. What would we need to do to make that > happen? What's the procedure for becoming the CinePaint Debian > maintainer?

Re: Bug#440969: vcf filters are highly unstable

2008-01-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 27, 2008 1:07 AM, Tim Blechmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... the vcf filters are still in debian ... so i again would like to > propose to remove the package ... http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx

2007-12-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Dec 22, 2007 9:38 AM, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tim wrote: > > Has anyone pinged Eduardo recently? This is an important package, which > > needs proper maintainance. The upload should probably be sponsored via > > debian-multimedia rather than QA. Opinions, Offers? :) > > Its in