On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 18:43 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> > That is certainly possible. Where are the patches? Any reason that
> > Erik can not incorporate them back upstream?
>
> I still haven't had it confirmed, but I believe that my current
> development sources c
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 15:25 +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> > I recently had a look at what was in ardour SVN and distilled a patch
> > which is currently in my development tree.
>
> A new libsndfile release sounds like the best solution for Debian to me.
> Any objections, Paul D?
i
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 14:12 +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > About libsndfile, how about the Debian libsndfile source package is
> > modified so that it produces a normal libsndfile library and a
> > libsndfile-ardour for ardour to build against.
>
> Or how about the libsndfile1 Debia
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:22 +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Paul W,
>
> > someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about
> > the evilness of embedded code copies.
>
> I don't think that's a very helpful approach. The Ardour team are
> already aware of Debian's reservations
i would like to make it clear that if Debian attempts to distribute a
version of Ardour that builds without internal linkage, we (the ardour
project) will be unable to provide support to any Debian user who has
problems of any kind. we have notified Gentoo of the same thing, and
have so far had to
Free - you *CANNOT* distribute this package. Torben and I have made this
very clear. Please remove it ASAP. It is a violation of our intent and
of the GPL to distribute it.
If and when Steinberg changes the license for the VSTSDK, things will
change. Until then, it has to be removed. Please do it
6 matches
Mail list logo
