Dear Maintainer,
REJECT: missing license/copyright data in debian/copyright.
autowaf.py is also (C) 2008 Nedko Arnaudov and is GPL 2+. The GPL is only
mentioned with respect to the debian/* files
lv2.h is also (C) 2000-2002 Richard W.E. Furse, Paul Barton-Davis, Stefan
Westerfield and is LGPL
tag 492871 moreinfo
thanks
This alone is not very useful. Please see:
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> tim hall wrote:
>> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to install Rosegarden on Gnome, but it takes a lot of kde
>>> packages with it in Debian, like konqueror etc. It basically messes
>>> up my Gnome installatio
retitle 494296 kdebase-bin: Uninstallable in Sid
tag 494296 unreproducible
reassign 494296 kdebase-bin
thanks
I cannot reproduce this bug either, marking it as unreproducible, but
since this is a problem installing kdebase-bin not rosegarden, I'm
reassigning.
Can you please show us the output of
I checked in a 1.6.1-3 revision of rosegarden to the demudi repository
on alioth. It adds a patch which fixes build problems with g++ 4.3,
which is now the default on (at least) ppc and arm, which is currently
causing build failures:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=rosegarden
I'd appriciate
We are not depending on kdebase-bin becuase of kdesu but becuase of
kdialog. Is this binary also changing locations? Is there somewhere
that you could point me that documents these changes?
thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 457007 fixed-upstream
tags 457007 confirmed
tags 457007 pending
thanks
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:47:35PM +, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/pre/rosegarden-1.6.1rc1.tar.bz2
>
> This has two fixes in it -- the fix to saving un-ramped tempos, and a fairly
> substan
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:1.6.0-1
Forwarded: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: Normal
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarding this bug which was originally reported to the rosegarden-user
list to the Debian bug tracking system
thanks,
stew
- Forwarded message from Chris Cannam <[EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:35:54AM +, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've seen you've been working on rosegarden 1.6. When you think the
> package is ready I can upload it. Ciao!
>
> Free
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote:
>
> >
> > === rosegarden:
> > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> > to testing for 123 days.
>
> This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev >=1.2.2-3 o
It looks like:
CFLAGS += -m3dnow -msse
was recently added to debian/rules. Those flags would not be valid
outside of i686.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The work-around for this bug is to install konqueror which provides
kfmclient.
However, I'm not comfortable adding konqueror as a rosegarden
dependency. Currently they invoke the browser using a KDE call to
KApp::invokeBrowser. I'm going to try to track down the implementation
and see if there i
severity 410587 wishlist
tag 410587 upstream
forwarded 410587 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I have sent this request to the upstream developers that they include
the changelog in their next release.
thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 410587 moreinfo
thanks
As far as I know, there is no upstream changelog in the upstream
changelog. If there is an upstream changelog that I'm missing, please
tell me where it is. Otherwise, i'll close this bug soon.
Thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 409255 grave
thanks
I'm upgrading this bug to grave at the behest of vorlon:
16:37 < vorlon> stew: yes, a bug of that level should be grave
thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Can you give some more details about how you have midi setup? Is the piano
connected via midi cables or usb? How have you assigned midi in the MIDI
devices section? " (Composition -> Studio -> Manage MIDI Devices)
Thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
also, can you show me the output of:
cat /proc/asound/timers
That will should definitively show whether your system timers are at 1khz or
400hz
thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Have you tried the recommendations in the rosegarden FAQ?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390409
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 288591 moreinfo
tags 210978 moreinfo
tags 254637 moreinfo
tags 291473 moreinfo
tags 311869 moreinfo
tags 317446 moreinfo
thanks
This is an old bug filed against an old version of rosegarden. I am not able
to reproduce it. Are you still able to reproduce this bug with a more
current versio
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:1.4.0-1
Severity: wishlist
The documentation in /usr/share/doc/rosegarden/README.Debian is a bit
out of date with respect to low latency / RTC. Some things have changed
since it was written, and it points you to a no longer existent file in
the jackd documentation.
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:47 +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>
> I'm using GNOME and when started, rosegarden complained that there is
> no jackd. I have jackd packages and it turned that qjackctl should
> also be installed. It's good if this is reflected in dependancies
> in some way.
qjackctl is not
I updated the rosegarden package in svn to the current upstream release
(1.2.4)
This version is a bugfix release from upstream. It incorporates a few
of the fixes we had made in 1.2.3, which is great. Our debian/patches
directory was reduced.
Free, Could you make another upload?
thanks,
stew
tags 16255 moreinfo
thanks as always
--
I am not able to reproduce this bug. I tried exporting a multi-track
file to a midi file then re-importing it, and it was re-imported as
distince tracks, not as one track.
If you are still able to reproduce this bug, please provide a file I can
test with.
tags 288501 moreinfo
thanks thanks thanks
--
I'm not able to reproduce this with the current version of rosegarden.
Are you still able to reproduce this with the current version of
rosegarden?
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
tags 346448 moreinfo
tags 304372 moreinfo
thanks
I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Are you able to reproduce this bug with the
lastest rosegarden package?
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Free Ekanayaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on 06/19/2006:
> |--==> Mike O'Connor writes:
>
> MO> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373885
> MO> I just checked in a new control file that declares Conflicts: against
> MO>
tags 374814 moreinfo
thanks
I cannot reproduce this big here. I have no /etc/lircrc nor a ~/.lircrc. What
lirc related pacakges do you have installed?
Can you provide an strace log?
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373885
I just checked in a new control file that declares Conflicts: against
the older rosegarden2,4 packages to try to fix this bug.
Hopefully later today I'll get time to start going through all the old
bugs and either close the obviously outdate
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:29 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> |--==> Free Ekanayaka writes:
>
> FE> Hi Mike,
> FE> I'm starting to work on the rosegarden source package you have
> FE> injected in the demudi Alioth SVN repository. It builds fine, but
> FE> there are still some lit
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:17 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Free, are you fine with the idea of using
> > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi for rosegarden as well?
> > >
> >
> > My account on alioth is stew-guest. I'd need to be put into the demudi
> > group.
>
> You're added, co
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 09:10 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Cool. I didn't realize that rosegarden4 was orphaned at all.
> > > I am interested in getting this thing updated in Debian.
> > >
> > > I prefer working out of a svn/cvs repos rather than shifting around
> > > whole packages
>
> Cool. I didn't realize that rosegarden4 was orphaned at all.
> I am interested in getting this thing updated in Debian.
>
> I prefer working out of a svn/cvs repos rather than shifting around
> whole packages.
I ran svn-inject, and my package is here:
svn://svn.vireo.org/rosegarden/roseg
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:20 +, tim hall wrote:
> I assume this is a glibc6 / gcc4 build, so I won't be testing this
> immediately.
My binary package is built in an up to date pbuilder, so it is the
lastest libc6 and gcc packages in sid. I kept the debhelper
compatibility at 4 so that the sou
I've packaged a newer version of rosegarden4. I have been trying to
normal means of finding a sponsor for this package (mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and asking a bunch of times on #debian-mentors), but I
haven't yet been successful. I didn't know about this mailing list
previously, so I thought I'd
34 matches
Mail list logo
