Bug#1024229: lives: please change recommends from youtube-dl to yt-dlp

2023-01-12 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:27:33 -0500 Andres Salomon wrote: > Package: lives > Version: 3.0.2-1.2 > Severity: normal > > We are planning to remove the youtube-dl package in the next Debian > release, as upstream development had issues and has stagnated (see > <https:

Bug#1024222: celluloid: please change recommends from youtube-dl to yt-dlp (or drop it completely)

2023-01-12 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:03:06 -0500 Andres Salomon wrote: > Package: celluloid > Version: 0.20-2 > Severity: normal > > We are planning for the youtube-dl package to become an empty package > that simply depends on yt-dlp (see <https://bugs.debian.org/994151>

Bug#1026866: libmpv1: please drop youtube-dl versioned recommends

2022-12-22 Thread Andres Salomon
Package: libmpv1 Version: 0.34.1-1+b5 Severity: minor We are planning to drop youtube-dl from the archive, as it has been replaced by yt-dlp (see for more details). The mpv package already recommends yt-dlp, but the libmpv1 package has an old versioned recommen

Bug#1024229: lives: please change recommends from youtube-dl to yt-dlp

2022-11-15 Thread Andres Salomon
Package: lives Version: 3.0.2-1.2 Severity: normal We are planning to remove the youtube-dl package in the next Debian release, as upstream development had issues and has stagnated (see https://bugs.debian.org/994151 ). The upstream package was forked, and active development now happens in yt-

Bug#1024222: celluloid: please change recommends from youtube-dl to yt-dlp (or drop it completely)

2022-11-15 Thread Andres Salomon
Package: celluloid Version: 0.20-2 Severity: normal We are planning for the youtube-dl package to become an empty package that simply depends on yt-dlp (see https://bugs.debian.org/994151 ). Your package has a "Recommends: youtube-dl". However, in looking through the source code, I don't see a

Bug#928210: CVE-2019-11471

2019-05-19 Thread Andres Salomon
Hi, Just FYI, there's a bunch of additional fuzz-related fixes in libheif's upstream git repo. I don't see any assigned CVEs other than the one you've tagged in this bug, but this heap buffer overflow fix in particular caught my eye as something we may want to include: https://github.com/struktu