mixxx is marked for autoremoval from testing

mixxx 2.4.1+dfsg-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-12-02 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1085429: ms-gsl: autopkgtest regression with llvm 19 as default: error: 'switch' missing 'default' label [-Werror,-Wswitch-default] https://bugs.debian.org/1085429 For mo

Processed: tagging 1086373, tagging 1086581, tagging 1086577, tagging 1086578, tagging 1023690 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1086373 + experimental Bug #1086373 [src:python-gphoto2] python-gphoto2: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.command.upload' Added tag(s) experimental. > tags 1086581 + sid trixie Bug #1086581 [src:stringencoders] stringen

Processed: Re: csound-plugins: FTBFS against HDF5 1.14 - Needs -DH5_USE_110_API

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1078984 [src:csound-plugins] csound-plugins: FTBFS against HDF5 1.14 - Needs -DH5_USE_110_API Added tag(s) patch. -- 1078984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1078984: csound-plugins: FTBFS against HDF5 1.14 - Needs -DH5_USE_110_API

Control: tags -1 patch Hi, On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:04:41 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > Source: csound-plugins > Version: 1.0.2~dfsg1-3 > Severity: important > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > The csound-plugins package fails to build from source in a test rebuild

Bug#1086584: Dupes in suffixes/codecs documentation

Package: bs1770gain Version: 0.6.5-1 (the outputs are all duplicates) bs1770gain --help=suffix|sort|uniq -d asf,wmv,wma mxf vob AND bs1770gain --help=codec|sort|uniq -d aac ac3 ac3_fixed adpcm_adx adpcm_ima_qt adpcm_ima_ssi adpcm_ima_wav adpcm_ms adpcm_swf adpcm_yamah

Bug#1086571: opus-tools: opusdec does not support alsa

Package: opus-tools Version: 0.2-1+b2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome

Processed: Proceeding with removal of gigedit

Processing control commands: > severity 1079966 normal Bug #1079966 [src:gigedit] Should gigedit be removed from unstable? Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > retitle 1079966 RM: gigedit -- RoQA; rc-buggy Bug #1079966 [src:gigedit] Should gigedit be removed from unstable? Changed Bug title t

Bug#1079966: Proceeding with removal of gigedit

Control: severity 1079966 normal Control: retitle 1079966 RM: gigedit -- RoQA; rc-buggy Control: reassign 1079966 ftp.debian.org Control: affects 1079966 + src:gigedit Dear gigedit maintainer and ftp team, a month has passed since filing a suggestion to remove gigedit from Debian. It was suggeste