Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 23:51:07 +0200
Source: suil
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Dennis Braun
Changes:
suil (0.10.12-1
suil_0.10.12-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
suil_0.10.12-1.dsc
suil_0.10.12.orig.tar.bz2
suil_0.10.12.orig.tar.bz2.asc
suil_0.10.12-1.debian.tar.xz
suil_0.10.12-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usp
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 23:18:52 +0200
Source: serd
Architecture: source
Version: 0.30.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Dennis Braun
Changes:
serd (0.30.12-1
serd_0.30.12-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
serd_0.30.12-1.dsc
serd_0.30.12.orig.tar.bz2
serd_0.30.12.orig.tar.bz2.asc
serd_0.30.12-1.debian.tar.xz
serd_0.30.12-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1012138 + upstream
Bug #1012138 [src:sox] CVE-2021-40426
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1012138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012138
Debian Bug Tr
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #935590 [libopusfile0] libopusfile0: Please make multi-arch co-installable
Added tag(s) pending.
--
935590: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: sox
Version: 14.4.2+git20190427-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2021-1434
The report states that upstream was notified, but we need to figure out
whether this was addressed by upstream already o
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #935590 [libopusfile0] libopusfile0: Please make multi-arch co-installable
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #935590 to the same tags previously set
--
935590: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935590
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 17:33:37 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 11:43:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > libopusfile0 and libopusfile-dev are not Multi-Arch co-installable
>
> This is still the case as of 0.12-1: Helmut's patch from #899138 has
> be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 935590
Bug #935590 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) }
[libopusfile0] libopusfile0: Please make multi-arch co-installable
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and
Control: reopen -1 0.12-1
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 11:43:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> libopusfile0 and libopusfile-dev are not Multi-Arch co-installable
This is still the case as of 0.12-1: Helmut's patch from #899138 has
been applied but my follow-up has not. I'll send a tested patch when I
h
Package: multimedia-devel
Version: 0.10
Severity: minor
Please remove the deprecated (see #895349) recommendation libart-2.0-dev.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:22:59 +0200
Source: opusfile
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
Close
opusfile_0.12-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
opusfile_0.12-1.dsc
opusfile_0.12-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965762: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #965762,
regarding opusfile: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935591: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935591,
regarding libopusfile0: new upstream version 0.11 available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#923031: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #923031,
regarding opusfile: updated package (new upstream, multiarch-capable, etc.)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935590: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935590,
regarding libopusfile0: Please make multi-arch co-installable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#899138: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #899138,
regarding libopusfile-dev: move opusfile.pc to a multiarch location
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#881788: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #881788,
regarding opusfile: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1007053: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007053,
regarding opusfile: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2022 09:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1009854: fixed in opusfile 0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009854,
regarding ITS: opusfile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1009854 1011231
Bug #1009854 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) }
[src:opusfile] ITS: opusfile
Bug #1011231 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) }
[src:opusfile] opusfile: diff for NMU version 0.12-1~exp1
Marked as fixed in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1011231 important
Bug #1011231 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) }
[src:opusfile] opusfile: diff for NMU version 0.12-1~exp1
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1011231 src:opusfile
Bug #1011231 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) }
[opusfile] opusfile: diff for NMU version 0.12-1~exp1
Bug reassigned from package 'opusfile' to 'src:opusfile'.
No longer marked as found in versions 0.9+20170913
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 990562 2:7.0~rc4-1
Bug #990562 {Done: Michael Tokarev } [src:qemu] qemu:
CVE-2021-3611: intel-hda: segmentation fault due to stack overflow
The source 'qemu' and version '2:7.0~rc4-1' do not appear to match any binary
packages
No longer
26 matches
Mail list logo
