We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
soundscaperenderer | 0.4.2~dfsg-7 | armel, armhf
soundscaperenderer-nox | 0.5.0~dfsg-4 | armel, armhf
--- Reason ---
RoQA; Outdated binaries
---
On 06-03-2020 21:00, rosea.grammostola wrote:
I asked if it would be a idea to package NSM without the non-toolkit
first, so with FLTK:
/"Totally reasonable. Again, I'm 99% sure that NSM's GUI doesn't use
any NTK specific features or controls."/
This would mean that 'we' would package NSM
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953267 [src:zita-at1] zita-at1 FTCBFS: hard codes the build architecture
pkg-config
Added tag(s) pending.
--
953267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953267
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Got some replies from upstream dev
/"You can get a tarball from a tag on github. Plus, I thought all
packagers have been doing things straight from git (no tarballs) for
like half a decade now. I can't remember the last time I touched a
tarball..."/
On 06-03-2020 19:07, Ross Gammon wrote:
Source: zita-at1
Version: 0.6.2-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
zita-at1 fails to cross build from source, because debian/rules hard
codes the build architecture pkg-config. A good solution is seeding it
from dpkg's buildtools.mk. Please consider applying the att
On 06-03-2020 19:17, Ross Gammon wrote:
Sorry - I forgot to add. Such a complicated package might not be a good
idea for you first package. There are plenty of other Debian Multimedia
packages that need some love. You could start with an easier one, and
come back to non-* later.
Thanks Ross,
Hi Rosea,
On 06/03/2020 19:07, Ross Gammon wrote:
>
> When learning packaging in Debian, I highly recommend using Debian Mentors:
> https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> On the Mentors mailing list, you will find many kind people willing to
> help answers those silly beginner questions.
Hi Rosea,
I looked at helping Jaromir package NTK a long time ago, and looked at
packaging the non-* applications more recently. KX-Studio have managed
to package them. But now that Erich has packaged Raysession in Ubuntu, I
am not in so much of a hurry.
I think Jonas is right. It is not impossib
Quoting rosea.grammostola (2020-03-06 16:56:52)
> I absolutely can't imagine that NSM can't get it into Debian. I'm
> determined to proof if. Any help to help me proof it would be
> appreciated. ;)
I agree it sounds quite odd if NSM cannot be packaged for Debian.
I am already overloaded with pr
Hi rosea,
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 16:42 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'll contact the main developer about this
> and
> report back.
>
> On 06-03-2020 16:27, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote:
> > In Ubuntu, I have packaged and included RaySession, which is
> > compl
On 06-03-2020 16:49, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
API compatible does not mean session compatible. It means that it
interacts with applications that are NSM ready. It's not meant to load
sessions from NSM. That's the misconception. I've heard the objections,
but unless the Non-* developers m
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I'll contact the main developer about this and
report back.
On 06-03-2020 16:27, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In Ubuntu, I have packaged and included RaySession, which is completely
API compatible with NSM and uses Qt as opposed to NTK. You can see it
at https://la
Hi rosea,
I hate to say this, but you're probably going to get nothing but
complete silence on this one.
I have tried to package Non-Session-Manager, but the source code is
done in a way that is incompatible with Debian packaging. They don't
release source tarballs for their releases, which is wh
Let's turn it around. Is there someone who can help me with packaging
Non-Session-Manager for Debian? My knowledge is lacking and certainly
not up-to-date.
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/Non%20Session%20Manager
First question: do I need a Debian install for this, or can I use Ubuntu
18.04?
R
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 735009 src:openvdb
Bug #735009 [openvdb] TestMeanCurvature.cc:574:Assertion
Bug reassigned from package 'openvdb' to 'src:openvdb'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.1.0.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #735009 to th
15 matches
Mail list logo
