Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 939106 src:laditools
Bug #939106 [laditools] laditools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye -- drop
python-distutils-extra build dependency
Bug reassigned from package 'laditools' to 'src:laditools'.
No longer marked as found in versions lad
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 936813 939106
Bug #936813 [src:laditools] laditools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #939106 is 'laditools' not 'src:laditools'
Failed to forcibly merge 936813: Did not alter merged bugs.
> than
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Part of the effort for the removal of python from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # ldtp
> block 933025 by 936833
Bug #933025 [src:ldtp] ldtp: Porting to python3,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Part of the effort for the removal of python from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # ldtp
> block 933025 by 936833
Bug #933025 [src:ldtp] ldtp: Porting to python3,
Hi Helmut!
On 10/23/19 6:23 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I looked back at the patch and am unsure here. I cannot imagine adding
> it just for reducing build time. It must have had an effect at that
> time. In general, building tests is not a problem for cross building.
> Just running them is. Could
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:23:10PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Indeed. But I have not figured out yet what the issue is. I can just say
> > that building with "nocheck" currently results in a broken .pc file.
>
> This is easy enough to diagnose. Just build it twice once without
> nocheck and o
On 10/23/19 6:28 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> So yeah, you should revert that part. Doing so will make it fail to
>> cross build. Making nocheck work requires a different fix I fear.
>
> Don't worry, as I mentioned (maybe too quickly?) in my email I already
> worked on a different solution, improv
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:37:51PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/23/19 5:23 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > This was added by Helmut to fix a FTCBFS. Are you sure removing the
> > -DBUILD_TESTS=0 doesn't break cross builds?
>
> Yes. You can verify that removing the whole para
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:43:00 +0200
Source: drumkv1
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
Chan
On 10/23/19 5:23 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> This was added by Helmut to fix a FTCBFS. Are you sure removing the
> -DBUILD_TESTS=0 doesn't break cross builds?
Yes. You can verify that removing the whole paragraph still makes "nocheck"
work the what you expect it, i.e.. the testsuite is still not
drumkv1_0.9.10-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
drumkv1_0.9.10-1.dsc
drumkv1_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
drumkv1_0.9.10-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #942795 [src:libsoxr] libsoxr: Building with "nocheck" results in a broken
soxr.pc pkg-config file
Added tag(s) pending.
--
942795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:39:17PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> ifneq ($(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
> CONFIGURE_FLAGS += -DBUILD_TESTS=0 -DBUILD_EXAMPLES=1
> endif
>
> With the paragraph removed, "nocheck" still works as expected and building
> with "nocheck" no longer res
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Part of the effort for the removal of python from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # ldtp
> block 933025 by 936833
Bug #933025 [src:ldtp] ldtp: Porting to python3,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #942906 [src:ardour] ardour: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
942906: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig
* Package name: fst
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : IOhannes m zmölnig
* URL : https://git.iem.at/zmoelnig/FST/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description : Free Studio Technology for au
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig
* Package name: vst3sdk
Version : 3.6.13
Upstream Author : Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
* URL : https://github.com/steinbergmedia/vst3sdk
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description :
17 matches
Mail list logo
