Hi Reinhard,
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-11-20 21:45:56)
> On Nov 20, 2014 3:01 PM, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> wrote:
>> Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-11-20 17:09:49)
>>> On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Possibly we can simplify even further:
* Have pack
On Nov 20, 2014 3:01 PM, "Jonas Smedegaard" wrote:
>
> Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-11-20 17:09:49)
> > On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Possibly we can simplify even further:
> >>
> >>* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
> >> (i.e. non-v
Hi,
On 20.11.2014 21:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-11-20 17:09:49)
On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Possibly we can simplify even further:
* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
(i.e. non-versioned name of itself
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-11-20 17:09:49)
> On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Possibly we can simplify even further:
>>
>>* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
>> (i.e. non-versioned name of itself)
>>* Let GPLv2 packages conflict again
Hi,
On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Possibly we can simplify even further:
* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
(i.e. non-versioned name of itself)
* Let GPLv2 packages conflict against libavcodec-extra (i.e. not
replace but complement
Hi,
On 19.11.2014 15:25, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Nov 19, 2014 8:24 AM, "Nicolas George" mailto:geo...@nsup.org>> wrote:
> It is perfectly legal and compatible with the license to USE a GPLv2
> program with a GPLv3 shared library or the other way around. Licenses can
> only control distribu
Hi,
On 19.11.2014 04:02, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
Furthermore I don't think it can always work.
For example look at the dependencies of libkfilemetadata4:
* libavformat56, which depends on libavcodec56 | libavcodec-extra-56
* libpopp
7 matches
Mail list logo
