Anunciarse por Internet como los mejores. Adwords de Google (ID:39452)

Su producto o servicio en las primeras páginas de Google.. Adwords de Google es Pago Por Click * Publicidad Segmentada * Pago sobre Resultados * Control de la Inversión * Resultados Inmediatos Asista a nuestro Seminario: Adwords, Pago Por Click Los detalles en: http://pago-por-click.in

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Hi Rosea, Not a good thing that such a core application is not in Debian stable / testing. True, but Lenny users can get a backport of Ardour 2.7 here: http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/a/ardour/ Why does other distro's like Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSuse have it included? Ubuntu prob

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:08:57PM +0100, Cassiel wrote: 2009/3/11 Daniel James Hi Raffaele, I can't go in deep about debian packages accept/reject workflow and policy stuff but non-free repository should allow some compromise in th

Re: RT prio settings and much more

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:08:57PM +0100, Cassiel wrote: >2009/3/11 Daniel James > > Hi Raffaele, > >I can't go in deep about debian packages accept/reject workflow and >policy stuff but non-free repository should allow some compromise in >these direction... > >

Re: RT prio settings and much more

2009/3/11 Daniel James > Hi Raffaele, > > I can't go in deep about debian packages accept/reject workflow and policy >> stuff but non-free repository should allow some compromise in these >> direction... >> > > It wasn't about free versus non-free (for once), it was that Ardour > developers were

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Hi Raffaele, I can't go in deep about debian packages accept/reject workflow and policy stuff but non-free repository should allow some compromise in these direction... It wasn't about free versus non-free (for once), it was that Ardour developers were forced to embedded their own forked ver

Re: RT prio settings and much more

2009/3/11 Daniel James > Hi Raffaele, > > "Debian does not support multimedia desktop/laptop users 'out of the >> box'." >> If you all were coding for debian packages probably they will ;-) >> > > We do, but what the Debian project chooses to make a priority is not under > the control of the sma

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Daniel James wrote: Hi Raffaele, "Debian does not support multimedia desktop/laptop users 'out of the box'." If you all were coding for debian packages probably they will ;-) We do, but what the Debian project chooses to make a priority is not under the control of the small multimedia packa

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Hi Raffaele, "Debian does not support multimedia desktop/laptop users 'out of the box'." If you all were coding for debian packages probably they will ;-) We do, but what the Debian project chooses to make a priority is not under the control of the small multimedia packaging team. For example

Re: RT prio settings and much more

2009/3/11 Daniel James > Hi Raffaele, > > Why only in 64studio and not in plain Debian? >> > > maybe if they did it on debian nobody would pick up 64 studio anymore... >> > > We have been contributing to Debian for years. The reason for a specialist > distribution is that official Debian doe

Re: RT prio settings and much more

Hi Raffaele, Why only in 64studio and not in plain Debian? maybe if they did it on debian nobody would pick up 64 studio anymore... We have been contributing to Debian for years. The reason for a specialist distribution is that official Debian does not support multimedia desktop/lapto

Re: RT prio settings and much more

2009/3/10 Grammostola Rosea > Daniel James wrote: > >> Hi Adrian, >> >> - FFADO: libfreebob is outdated, there are so many users in #ffado >>>asking for FFADO packages. >>> >> >> We're aiming to have this package in 64 Studio 3.0, we also need to change >> our 2.6.29-rc4 kernel to support t