HI Reinhard,
|--==> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:18:56 +0100, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>>We would still be compliant with the git-buildpackage standards, but
>>we would simply have more branches than only master and upstream.
RT> I did not (yet) have a look at git-buildpackage
Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>As said, I would stick to the git-buildpackage standards, that means a
> >>git branch for upstream sources, which can get imported with
> >>git-import-orig
>
> LM> Sounds right!
>
> We would still be compliant with the git-buildpackage standa
El 01/12/08 05:36 Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> (did you mail me in private on purpose? if not, feel free to quote
> anything in this mail in public)
Oops, no, that was an accident. Replying to list now for completeness sake.
>
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > El 30/11/08 15:07 Rei
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:26:33 +0100, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
RT> Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FS> OK, I've started a page: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Merge.
Please
FS> add, edit, remove whatever you think necessary. I just
Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FS> OK, I've started a page: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Merge.
> Please
> FS> add, edit, remove whatever you think necessary. I just filled a stub
> based on
> FS> what I think we have agreed.
>
> Excellent. Apparently pkg-multime
5 matches
Mail list logo