What to do for new packages (was: Multimedia Teams in Debian)

2008-11-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
OK, so I'm about to co-maintain liblo, which is an OSC library, and can be considered a multimedia package (csound, rosegarden and ardour are some "big" packages using it). So... I want to bring it under the scope of the teams-to-become-one. I have imported the sources into a git repository. dem

Bug#506953: new upstream version 0.0.2.20081029 available for openmovieeditor

2008-11-26 Thread shirish
Hi all, Also look into the release notes http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=142766&release_id=636706 Notes: This releases changes the version requirements back to libquicktime 1.0.0 again, because it is an extra hassle to upgrade libquicktime, especially because distributions

Bug#506953: new upstream version 0.0.2.20081029 available for openmovieeditor

2008-11-26 Thread shirish
Package: openmovieeditor Version: 0.0.20080102-2.1build1.1 Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** new upstream version available http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=142766&release_id=636706 Please see if this can be packaged? -- System Information: D

Re: FFMpeg package maintenance, was: Multimedia Teams in Debian

2008-11-26 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard Tartler schrieb: I have mixed feelings. on the one hand, this surely seems to be a great idea to improve debian. On the other hand, I'd like to avoid to avoid to clutter our set of maintained packages (and therefore the debian archive) with substandard packages nobody cares for anymore.