El 22/11/08 05:47 Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think it avoids confusion to have a single list. If later on it shows
> > to be a problem, the list can be split. Maintaining both lists from the
> > start sounds like preemptive optimization to me.
>
>
I haven't said the following aloud yet, because I wanted to discuss this
seperatly from the merging discussion. But that topic was rised in part
of that discussion, I'm replying to that part seperatly with a new
subject. Please read this mal al an RFC.
Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it avoids confusion to have a single list. If later on it shows to be
> a problem, the list can be split. Maintaining both lists from the start
> sounds like preemptive optimization to me.
Ok, with that having in mind, I'm OK with using a c
3 matches
Mail list logo