Processed: block 446597 with 444204

2007-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > block 446597 with 444204 Bug#444204: scons: version 0.97.0d20070918-1 fails to clean csound 5.06 but 0.97.0d20070809-1 doesn't Bug#446597: FTBFS after checking for pkg-config and 'ca

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Friday 26 October 2007 14:52:00 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-26 18:50]: > > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > > > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > > > solve this, they added some uninstall r

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Felipe, * Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-26 18:50]: > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > > solve this, they added some uninstall rule referring to > > upstream. > > What revision? I can't see an

Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:49 Nico Golde wrote: > Updating to the latest Scons build file in ardour svn should > solve this, they added some uninstall rule referring to > upstream. What revision? I can't see anything in the websvn at http://viewcvs.ardour.org/log.php?repname=Ardour&path=%

Re: Please test csound

2007-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Friday 26 October 2007 04:50:08 you wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > I did the uploads for csound for Hans Fugal. But I am sorry, I currently > do not have the time to do a decent review. Hope that someone else will > be able to do so. Did you ask on other lists too ? Hmm, I though I'd a better review h

Re: Please test csound

2007-10-26 Thread Günter Geiger
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:57 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2007 01:18:06 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Hi. I've been working on csound, and I think the package is going nice. I > > would like, however, an independent review of the package. > > Is anyone going to check this out? I