Bug#412978: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#412978: rosegarden: is uninstallable (depends on libjack0 which doesnt exist))

2007-03-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
|--==> Steve Langasek writes: SL> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:14AM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:42:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >>> which was filed against the rosegarden package. >>I've the same problem with 1.5.0-3 SL> Yes, I see that

Bug#412978: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#412978: rosegarden: is uninstallable (depends on libjack0 which doesnt exist))

2007-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:14AM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:42:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > which was filed against the rosegarden package. > I've the same problem with 1.5.0-3 Yes, I see that the amd64 binary of 1:1.5.0-3, uploaded by the ma

Bug#412978: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#412978: rosegarden: is uninstallable (depends on libjack0 which doesnt exist))

2007-03-02 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:42:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > which was filed against the rosegarden package. > > It has been closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a