On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 18:00 +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> The original versioning scheme was decided upon by Junichi and me mainly
> due to lines 40-42 in the configure.ac file. The policy was stressed
> many times on the jack mailing list.
The real reason for keeping the version in the package n
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:36 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I'm sorry but I have to bother you again with the versioning issue of
> the jack package.
> Here below is a copy of the reply I sent to Paul Davis on the Jack
> mailing list. It seems that this issue is making life harder for
> p
I'm sorry but I have to bother you again with the versioning issue of
the jack package.
Here below is a copy of the reply I sent to Paul Davis on the Jack
mailing list. It seems that this issue is making life harder for
people wanting to compile and run bleeding-edge versions of jack.
Is
Hi.
Thanks for answer.
On 11/29/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:36:50PM -0200, Marcio Roberto Teixeira wrote:
> Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
> Version: 0.102.20-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> clean target don
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:36:50PM -0200, Marcio Roberto Teixeira wrote:
> Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
> Version: 0.102.20-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> clean target don't run properly. This problem is effect of cdbs bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
binwUgrDAGgQn.bin
Description: image/jpg
6 matches
Mail list logo