Re: Bug#363108: Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

2006-08-04 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Saturday 05 August 2006 05:28, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to > > clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. > > > > Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to > > match exactly th

Re: Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

2006-08-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to > clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. > > Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to > match exactly the upstream project name. In this case the upstream > name is "vcf

Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

2006-08-04 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi all, I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to match exactly the upstream project name. In this case the upstream name is "vcf", which

Processing of omins_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes

2006-08-04 Thread Archive Administrator
omins_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: omins_0.2.0-1.dsc omins_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz omins_0.2.0-1.diff.gz omins_0.2.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

omins_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Installer
(new) omins_0.2.0-1.diff.gz optional sound (new) omins_0.2.0-1.dsc optional sound (new) omins_0.2.0-1_amd64.deb optional sound a collection of LADSPA plugins aimed at modular synthesizers These plugins are provided: Range translator, Formant filter, AD Envelope, DAHDSR Envelope, Hz to V/Oct conv